Consumer Law

Hi,
I think more than the scope, the interest of individual matters for success in a particular area of law. Let's say, for example, I am interested in information technology law but I pursue consumer law after my law school. I would not be working with that zeal or enthusiasm as compared to IT law. Therefore, according to me, the interest mattes more than the scope as you can make money under any area of law and practice.
But coming to the question, most of the areas of law are interlinked. Which one has a better scope? I think both of these are too diverse fields and have a lot of subject matters within. Both information technology and consumer law are governed by specific legislation. But surely, in the era of information technology I think information technology law has better scope in the future. It is because of the fact that with growing technology, the offenses and penalties would be increased and would surely be one of the most interesting areas of law.

The additional benefits that one can expect out of pursuing a Diploma or PG Diploma in consumer law would range from placements to independent practice to academics.
A well-qualified aspirant is much appreciated and recruiters look for candidates having additional qualifications.
This would help you get a better placement at first instance. Apart from that, it would help you in setting up your independent practices. Moreover, after completion of a PG or Diploma, you may opt for teaching profession, wherein you could easily be appointed as a consumer law professor provided you clear UGC NET.
Also, having a specialized knowledge makes you a better lawyer and helps you to stand out of the crowd.
Thus, the benefits are many as and when you enter the world of professions, you shall observe what all benefits accrue out of your additional qualifications.