When it comes to database optimization, the choice between clustered and non-clustered indexes plays a pivotal role. Each type offers distinct advantages and trade-offs, influencing query performance and storage considerations. Database administrators and developers can devise effective strategies for enhancing overall system efficiency by comprehending the fundamental disparities between these indexes.
Understanding the difference between clustered and non-clustered indexes is crucial for optimizing database performance. This article provides a detailed comparison of these two types of indexes, shedding light on their unique characteristics and the scenarios in which they are most effective.
Table of Content
What is the Difference Clustered Index and Non-Clustered Index?
| Parameter |
Clustered Index |
Non-Clustered Index |
| Definition |
A clustered index determines the physical order of data storage in a table. |
A non-clustered index is a separate object that contains the index keys and row locators. |
| Number per Table |
Only one clustered index is allowed per table. |
Multiple non-clustered indexes can be created on a single table. |
| Data Storage |
Data rows are stored in the same order as the clustered index keys. |
Data rows are stored in their original order, separate from the index. |
| Index Structure |
The index structure and data are stored together. |
The index structure is separate from the data storage. |
| Index Size |
Usually smaller due to the combined storage of data and index. |
Larger than clustered indexes are due to the separate storage of index and data. |
| Performance |
Faster for range queries and ordered data retrieval. |
Faster for single-row lookups and equality searches. |
| Index Maintenance |
More expensive for insert, update, and delete operations. |
Less expensive for maintenance operations. |
| Fragmentation |
More prone to fragmentation due to data modifications. |
Less prone to fragmentation due to separate storage. |
| Covered Queries |
It cannot cover queries since data is stored with the index. |
It can cover queries if all required columns are part of the index. |
| Rebuilding |
Rebuilding requires more resources and time due to data reorganization. |
Rebuilding is relatively faster and requires fewer resources. |
What is a Clustered Index?
A clustered index is a type of index where the index keys determine the physical order of data storage in a table. When a clustered index is created on a table, the data rows are physically sorted and stored in the same order as the index keys.
For example, consider a table named "Employees" with columns like "EmployeeID", "FirstName", "LastName", and "Department".
If we create a clustered index on the "EmployeeID" column, the data rows in the table will be physically sorted and stored based on the "EmployeeID" values.
This means that when you perform a query that involves the "EmployeeID" column, the database can quickly locate the required data by following the clustered index structure.
What is a Non-Clustered Index?
A non-clustered index is a separate object containing the index keys and row locators (pointers) to the data rows in the table. Unlike clustered indexes, the physical order of data storage in the table is not determined by the non-clustered index keys.
Continuing with the "Employees" table example, let's say we create a non-clustered index on the "LastName" column.
The non-clustered index stores the "LastName" values along with pointers or row locators to the actual data rows in the table.
When you perform a query involving the "LastName" column, the database first locates the relevant index entries using the non-clustered index and then follows the row locators to retrieve the actual data rows from the table.
Key Difference Between Clustered and Non-Clustered Index
- Number of Clustered Indexes per Table: A table can have only one clustered index, whereas multiple non-clustered indexes can be created on a single table.
- Data Storage Order: In a clustered index, the index keys determine the physical order of data storage in the table. Non-clustered indexes store only the index keys and row locators, while the data rows are stored in their original order, separate from the index structure.
- Performance Characteristics: Clustered indexes generally perform better for range queries and ordered data retrieval, while non-clustered indexes are more efficient for single-row lookups and equality searches.
- Index Maintenance: Maintaining a clustered index is more expensive than maintaining a non-clustered index because any insert, update, or delete operation requires reorganizing the data to preserve the sorted order. Non-clustered index maintenance is less expensive.
- Covered Queries: Non-clustered indexes can cover queries (retrieve all required data from the index without accessing the table) if all the required columns are part of the index, but clustered indexes cannot cover queries since the data is stored with the index.
Conclusion
In conclusion, clustered and non-clustered indexes differ in their underlying structure, organization, and impact on data retrieval. While clustered indexes dictate the physical order of data within the table, non-clustered indexes provide an alternative means of accessing data.
By grasping the disparities between these index types, database stakeholders can implement indexing strategies aligning with their specific performance and storage requirements.
Hope you will like the article.
Keep Learning!!
Keep Sharing!!
