StringBuilder Vs. StringBuffer: Differences and Applications
This article will explore StringBuilder Vs. stringBuffer topic where you will also explore the applications of StrinBuilder and StringBuffer
Strings are one of the most commonly used classes in Java. The StringBuffer and StringBuilder classes provide methods for manipulating strings. Both the Android development community and the public, in general, are familiar with strings. A string is a sequence of characters stored in a file or a database. In computer science, strings are used to store text, numeric values, and binary data. Android has its built-in string class that provides fast access to strings stored on the Android device. However, many third-party libraries provide faster access to strings stored in memory. This can be a useful optimization for slow or expensive database calls or file operations. Letโs take a look at StringBuilder Vs. stringBuffer. StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder is a common question in Java interviews.
Table of contents
Best-suited Java courses for you
Learn Java with these high-rated online courses
Difference Between StringBuilder and StringBuffer
Feature | StringBuilder | StringBuffer |
Thread-Safety | Not thread-safe | Thread-safe |
Performance | More efficient | Slightly less efficient due to thread-safety |
Synchronization | Not synchronized | Synchronized |
Mutability | Mutable | Mutable |
Usage | Suitable for single-threaded environments | Suitable for multi-threaded environments |
Modifiability | Supports modification and appending | Supports modification and appending |
Memory Allocation | Less memory allocation overhead | Slightly more memory allocation overhead |
Recommended in | Non-concurrent scenarios, performance-critical operations | Concurrent scenarios, thread-safe environments |
Also read: Difference between Static and Dynamic memory allocation
What is StringBuilder?
StringBuilder is a class in the Java programming language that allows you to create mutable (modifiable) strings. It is similar to the String class, which represents fixed-length, immutable character sequences. Still, StringBuilder is more efficient when you need to make many modifications to a string, such as appending multiple strings together or deleting characters from the middle of a string.
Here are some key points about StringBuilder:
- StringBuilder is not synchronized, meaning it is not thread-safe, so it should not be used in a multithreaded environment. If you need to use a mutable string in a multithreaded environment, you should use StringBuffer instead.
- StringBuilder has many methods that allow you to modify the String, such as append, insert, and delete.
- StringBuilder is more efficient than StringBuffer when you need to make many modifications to a string, but it is less efficient than String when you only need to read the String or concatenate a few strings together.
- StringBuilder was introduced in Java 1.5.
Syntax
StringBuffer abc = new StringBuffer(str);
For more information, Read: Data Types in Java โ Primitive and Non-Primitive Data Types Explained.
For more, Read: OOPs Concepts in Java.
Applications of StringBuilder
Here are some examples of situations where you might use a StringBuilder:
StringBuilder
StringBuilder
StringBuilder
StringBuilder
For more information: Method Overloading in Java
Must check: Java Online Courses & Certifications
Also explore: Free Java Courses Online
What is a Stringbuffer?
StringBuffer is a class in the Java programming language that allows you to create mutable (modifiable) strings. It is similar to the String class, which represents fixed-length, immutable character sequences. Still, StringBuffer is more efficient when you need to make many modifications to a string, such as appending multiple strings together or deleting characters from the middle of a string.
Syntax
StringBuilder abc = new StringBuilder(str);
Here are some key points about StringBuffer:
- StringBuffer is synchronized, meaning its methods are thread-safe and can be safely used in a multithreaded environment. If you need to use a mutable string in a single-threaded environment, it is generally more efficient to use StringBuilder instead.
- StringBuffer has many methods that allow you to modify the String, such as append, insert, and delete. It also has some additional methods not available in StringBuilder, such as reverse and strength.
- StringBuffer is more efficient than StringBuilder when you need to make many modifications to a string in a multithreaded environment. Still, it is not as efficient as String when you only need to read the String or concatenate a few strings together.
- StringBuffer was introduced in Java 1.0.
Applications of StringBuffer
StringBuffer
StringBuffer
StringBuffer
StringBuffer
StringBuffer
Key Differences between StringBuilder and StringBuffer
They both are used to create mutable (modifiable) strings in Java. Some differences are listed below-
- StringBuffer is synchronized, meaning its methods are thread-safe and can be safely used in a multithreaded environment. On the other hand, StringBuilder is not synchronized, which makes it faster than StringBuffer, but it is not thread-safe and should not be used in a multithreaded environment.
- StringBuffer has all of the same methods as StringBuilder, but StringBuilder has some additional methods that make it easier to use, such as appendCodePoint and insert.
- StringBuffer was introduced in Java 1.0, while StringBuilder was introduced in Java 1.5.
In general, if you need to use a mutable string in a single-threaded environment, it is recommended to use StringBuilder because it is faster. If you need to use a mutable string in a multithreaded environment, you should use StringBuffer.
Conclusion
A string builder implements the C++ standard library class using an internal buffer instead of a constant-length memory pool. This allows for faster app processing. However, it also increases memory consumption and processor load since the buffer must be copied into main memory as each new String is created. Typically, string builders are slower than regular string buffers when accessing very large strings or repetitive characters. However, theyโre faster when accessing smaller strings that only produce a few repetitions of a similar pattern.
Related reads:
FAQs
Can I convert StringBuffer to StringBuilder and vice versa?
Yes, you can convert between StringBuffer and StringBuilder by using their respective constructors. However, keep in mind that the thread safety aspect will be lost when converting from StringBuffer to StringBuilder
Which one should I choose, StringBuilder or StringBuffer?
Choose StringBuilder if you are working in a single-threaded environment or if you can ensure thread safety through other means. Choose StringBuffer if you are working in a multi-threaded environment and require thread safety.
Which one is faster, StringBuilder or StringBuffer?
In general, StringBuilder is faster than StringBuffer because it doesn't incur the overhead of synchronization. However, the performance difference may be negligible in certain scenarios.
This is a collection of insightful articles from domain experts in the fields of Cloud Computing, DevOps, AWS, Data Science, Machine Learning, AI, and Natural Language Processing. The range of topics caters to upski... Read Full Bio