Difference Between Bus and Star Topology
The main difference between bus and star topology is that in a bus topology, all devices are connected to a single cable or backbone called the bus. The bus serves as the central communication path, and all devices use it as the medium for data transmission. Meanwhile, in a star topology, all devices are connected to a central node or hub using dedicated point-to-point connections. The central node acts as a communication controller, and data passes through it before reaching the intended recipient.
In this article, we will explore the difference between bus and star topology in detail. But before diving further into the topic, let's go through the list of topics we will cover in this article.
Table of Content (TOC)
- Difference Between Bus and Star Topology
- What is a Bus Topology?
- What is a Star Topology?
- Which Topology Offers Better Fault Tolerance, Bus or Star?
- Which Topology Provides Better Performance Between Bus and Star?
- Between Bus and Star Topologies, Which One is More Cost-Effective to Implement?
- Which Topology is Easier to Troubleshoot and Manage, Bus or Star?
- Between Bus and Star Topology, Which is More Suitable for Larger Networks?
- What Are Some Advantages of Star Topology Over Bus Topology?
Difference Between Bus and Star Topology
For better clarity, here's a table that differentiates these two topologies based on various parameters.
Parameter | Bus Topology | Star Topology |
---|---|---|
Physical Layout | All devices connected linearly to a single cable (bus/backbone) | All devices connected to a central node via dedicated point-to-point links |
Communication Method | Broadcast - data transmitted over shared bus in both directions | Point-to-Point - data transmitted between devices and central node |
Fault Tolerance | Single point of failure - if bus cable fails, entire network fails | Only affected device is impacted - rest of network remains operational |
Performance | Shared bandwidth - potential for collisions and performance degradation | Dedicated bandwidth for each device - reduced collisions and better performance |
Cost | Less expensive - requires less cabling | More expensive - requires dedicated cabling for each device connection |
Troubleshooting | Difficult - shared medium makes isolating faults challenging | Easier - central node can monitor and diagnose individual connections |
Scalability | Limited - adding devices can disrupt entire network | More scalable - devices can be added/removed without affecting rest of network |
Examples | Ethernet (10BASE5, 10BASE2), ARCnet, token-passing networks | Ethernet (modern implementations), Wi-Fi networks |
Must Explore: What are the Different Types of Network Topology?
Best-suited Networking courses for you
Learn Networking with these high-rated online courses
What is a Bus Topology?
A Bus Topology is a type of network topology in which all devices are connected to a single cable or backbone called the bus.
Bus topologies were commonly used in legacy networks like Ethernet (10BASE5 and 10BASE2), ARCnet, and some token-passing networks. But, due to various limitations, such as single point of failure, shared bandwidth, difficulty in troubleshooting, etc., bus topologies are less common in modern networks and have been largely replaced by star topologies.
For more information regarding the Bus topology, refer to the What is a Bus Topology article.
What is a Star Topology?
A Star Topology is a type of network topology in which all devices are connected to a central node or hub using dedicated point-to-point connections. (Switches, routers, and wireless access points are common devices used as central nodes in star topologies.)
Star topologies are widely used in modern LANs and are the most common topology for Ethernet networks. They offer advantages such as increased performance, better fault tolerance, easier troubleshooting, and centralized management. But this topology requires more cabling than a bus and is more expensive to set up, especially for larger networks.
For more information on Star topology, refer to the What is a Star Topology article.
Which Topology Offers Better Fault Tolerance, Bus or Star?
Star Topology offers better fault tolerance. If a cable or device fails in a Star Topology, only that connection is affected, while the rest of the network remains operational. In a Bus Topology, if the bus cable fails, the entire network fails.
Which Topology Provides Better Performance Between Bus and Star?
Star topology performs better as the central node can more efficiently manage and regulate data flow.
Between Bus and Star Topologies, Which One is More Cost-Effective to Implement?
Bus Topology is typically less expensive to implement as it requires less cabling than Star Topology, where each device needs a dedicated connection to the central node.
Which Topology is Easier to Troubleshoot and Manage, Bus or Star?
Star Topology is easier to troubleshoot and manage. The central node can monitor and diagnose issues with individual connections, making identifying and isolating faults simpler. In a Bus Topology, troubleshooting can be more challenging as all devices share the same communication medium.
Between Bus and Star Topology, Which is More Suitable for Larger Networks?
Star Topology is generally more suitable for larger networks compared to Bus Topology. Star topologies offer better scalability, as devices can be added or removed from the central node without disrupting the entire network. Bus topologies can become challenging to manage and maintain as the number of devices increases.
What Are Some Advantages of Star Topology Over Bus Topology?
Some advantages of Star Topology over Bus Topology are:
- Better performance and reduced collisions due to dedicated connections
- Improved fault tolerance and easier troubleshooting
- Centralized management and monitoring capabilities
- Scalability and ease of adding or removing devices
Must Read Articles Related to Topologies:
Anshuman Singh is an accomplished content writer with over three years of experience specializing in cybersecurity, cloud computing, networking, and software testing. Known for his clear, concise, and informative wr... Read Full Bio