Unity of Command Principle of Management
The unity of command is one of Henri Fayol's 14 principles of management. Unity of command suggests that an employee should receive commands, instructions, or duties from one superior or manager. This principle is important because its absence can affect other principles like authority, responsibility, and discipline. This blog explains the unity of command principle of management.
Content
- What is Unity of Command?
- Definitions – Unity of Command
- Objectives of the Unity of Command
- Why Should Businesses Follow the Unity of Command?
- Advantages of the Unity of Command
- Disadvantages of the Unity of Command
What is Unity of Command?
One of the most fundamental principles of management is the unity of command, which means that an employee should receive instructions from only one superior or manager at a time. This principle would bring clarity and accountability and avoid confusion in the chain of command. The Unity of Command is one of the essential features of organizational structure. It is used to streamline decision-making processes and avoid conflicts caused by receiving instructions from multiple sources.
Best-suited General Management courses for you
Learn General Management with these high-rated online courses
Definitions – Unity of Command Principle of Management
Henry Fayol: “For action whatsoever, an employee should receive orders from one superior only.”
Pfiffner and Presthus: “The concept of the unity of command requires that every member of an organization should report to one, and only one leader.”
Dimock and Dimock: “A corollary of the chain of command is the unity of command, the principle that each employee should have only one boss.”
William Fox and Ivan H. Meyer: “Unity of command means an organizational principle that each person within the line of authority should be responsible to only other person.”
Unity of Command is a central idea in Luther Gulick‟ 's organization theory, which refers to subordinates, not those issuing commands.
Read Later
Objectives of the Unity of Command
The objectives of the unity of command are the following:
- Establish a direct relationship between employees and the superior.
- Get innovation, development and support from all employees.
- Make employees more experienced and more productive.
- Avoid conflicts of confusion about how to respond to an order.
- Establish an order within the organization to ensure productivity.
Why Should Businesses Follow the Unity of Command?
Observing the unity of command is essential to avoid organizational confusion and manipulation. Duality or multiplicity of command keeps an employee under confusion and conflicting situations, for instance, “whom” to follow and “what” to follow. Further, a subordinate can also evade orders by playing off one superior against another, undermining the organizational purpose. Here are some of the primary reasons why companies must adhere to this principle:
1. Prevents Confusion and Conflicts: Employees who receive orders from multiple managers may struggle to determine which directive to prioritize.
Unity of command eliminates the risk of conflicting instructions, making it easier for employees to focus on tasks.
2. Enhances Accountability: The reporting structure makes identifying who is accountable for decisions or outcomes easy.
Employees and managers are more accountable for their roles and responsibilities, making it less likely for finger-pointing or blame-shifting.
3. Avoids Manipulation: Employees may try to manipulate the multiple reporting lines by making one manager confront another to get out of the tasks or duties. Unity of command eliminates such situations by providing a single line of authority and decision.
4. Streamlines Communication: A direct line of communication between managers and subordinates ensures clear and consistent instructions, thus eliminating misunderstandings and ensuring that the organizational goals are communicated and achieved effectively.
5. Improves Employee Focus: Employees can concentrate on their tasks
without worrying that they might receive different directives and priorities coming from other managers, leading to better productivity and a higher quality of work.
6. Strengthens Organizational Structure: A transparent reporting chain enables a smooth operation.
The employee understands its roles and responsibilities within the organization.
7. Supports Effective Decision-Making: Managers can make and convey decisions more efficiently with no overlap in authority, thereby speeding processes and ensuring timely implementation of strategies.
Examples in Business Context
- Customer Service: A customer support agent reports directly to the customer service manager. If the operations manager also starts assigning tasks, the agent might face conflicting priorities, affecting response times and customer satisfaction.
- Project Teams: In a product development team, developers should receive guidance only from the project manager. Project delivery could be delayed if the marketing head and technical lead give contradictory instructions.
- Retail Chains: A store manager takes orders from the regional manager, not directly from the corporate office. This avoids confusion about sales targets or operational guidelines.
Advantages of the Unity of Command
- The unity of command helps to develop a much clearer relationship between superiors and subordinates.
- Results in clear and well-organized authority, responsibility, and accountability among the various levels of the organization.
- Helps reduce or avoid duplication of work between different levels of the organization’s workforce.
- The unity of command helps managers to be able to make quick or immediate decisions correctly.
- Unity of command will ensure effective and efficient discipline among organizational personnel.
- The unity of command guarantees better coordination and teamwork of workers in the organization.
- Increases motivation and generates a positive attitude among the workers of the organization.
- Leads to higher productivity of goods and services. Consequently, this creates a better image or brand of the organization in the market.
Explore these online degree programmes–
Disadvantages of the Unity of Command
- Strict adherence to the unity of command can limit flexibility within an organization.
- It may limit the flow of information and ideas between different departments.
- When all communication and decision-making authority is concentrated in a single supervisor, it can create bottlenecks and overload.
- Too much dependency on the unity of command may negatively impact individual autonomy and empowerment.
- Rigid hierarchies can hinder responsiveness to change.
- Team members may be reluctant to leave their comfort zones, hindering the evolving business needs.
The unity of command principle of management enhances organizational structure, communication, accountability, and decision-making. By following this principle, businesses can foster a more efficient, productive, and harmonious work environment.
FAQs
Why is the unity of command important in an organization?
Unity of command is important because it provides clarity, accountability, and efficient decision-making within an organization's structure.
How does the unity of command facilitate efficient decision-making?
With a single reporting line, decisions can be made more efficiently as they do not need to go through multiple layers of management, reducing delays and improving communication.
Can an employee have multiple supervisors under the principle of unity of command?
No, the principle of unity of command suggests that an employee should report to only one supervisor to maintain clarity and avoid conflicts.
Does the unity of command hinder cross-functional collaboration?
Strict adherence to unity of command can limit cross-functional collaboration as employees may face challenges in obtaining input or guidance from multiple supervisors.
How can organizations mitigate the drawbacks of unity of command?
Organizations can mitigate drawbacks by promoting flexible communication channels, empowering employees, encouraging collaboration, and considering alternative structures that balance accountability and autonomy.
Rashmi is a postgraduate in Biotechnology with a flair for research-oriented work and has an experience of over 13 years in content creation and social media handling. She has a diversified writing portfolio and aim... Read Full Bio
Top Picks & New Arrivals
