XAT 2015 analysis: Exam tricky and lengthy
5 mins read6K Views 2 Comments
Parasharan Chari
COO, Endeavor Careers
Updated on Jan 4, 2015 19:41 IST
XAT 2015 analysis
XAT 2015 paper quality as such stands out. For
the fact that CAT was easier and far less intensive, XAT turns out to be
a redefinition of an uphill task. Decision making time consuming,
Reasoning missing, Verbal Ability time consuming and options misleading
and Quantitative Aptitude only saving grace and if that wasn’t enough, a
beautiful essay writing topic was staring at the aspirants’ face. All in
all a welcome to the new year with a paper that made everyone realise the
importance of a preparation.As far as aptitude is concerned, this year’s
XAT (XAT analysis) can be considered a slightly more difficult paper in comparison to
XAT’14.
Sections-wise analysis of XAT 2015 is as follows:
XAT 2015 exam analysis:
Verbal Ability Section:
It
had 17 questions of Reading Comprehension and 11 questions of verbal
ability. There were 5 sets of RCs, out of which 3 were easy to moderate
and rest 2 were moderate to difficult. 2 of the RCs were around 150 word
RCs and hence were easy to interpret and hence won’t be so time
consuming. There was one RC that was dense and technical in nature and
hence aspirants would have comfortably left it. With the decisions of
which RC to do and which one not to do, being easy, the section seemed
approachable. Verbal Ability part had a nice mix of 2 parajumbles, 4
vocabulary questions, 2 logical continuations and 3 critical reasoning
questions. An above average aspirant should be able to attempt up to 4
RCs and approximately 7 questions of verbal ability in an ideal time of
45 minutes.
Given the scenario where he makes around 17 to 18 attempts, a score of around 12+ can be considered a good score and that means a percentile of around 98.
Quantitative Ability & Data Interpretation:
This section had two sets of Data Interpretation which in total had eight questions.
In addition to DI there were 25 questions of quant. Data interpretation
was easier than previous year’s DI and as a reasonably well prepared
aspirant should be able to solve 4 moderate Qs. Rest 4 Qs were difficult
and time consuming. As far as quant is concerned, it again demanded
sincere solving. It was dominated by Arithmetic based chapters. About 13
Qs were from this part of quant with nearly equal distribution of
easy-moderate-difficult Qs. There were about 8 questions of Geometry as well;
nearly all of them were moderate to difficult. All in all, the difficulty
level in comparison to last year has gone down slightly.
Careful selection of questions would have given an above average aspirant around 18 attempts and a score of 13+ which can be classified as a good score and a good score means a percentile of around 98.
Decision Making and Analytical Reasoning:-
Not a single question of Analytical Reasoning in
this section – was an impressive move by XAT. XAT 2014 had 9 questions of
Analytical Reasoning and 16 questions of Decision Making and that wasn’t
a really smart move because the aspirants really did not push themselves
to solve the Decision Making, they found their way to the cutoffs through
AR. This year, it was predominantly Decision Making with just one set
which was an application of Set theory & Data Interpretation skills.
Almost all sets were time consuming but doable for an aspirant who can
sit patiently and solve them.
Considering the presence of about 7 easy to moderate questions, in an ideal time of 45 minutes, an above average aspirant would have managed good 16-17 attempts in this section and a score of 9+ can be considered a good score and a good score means a percentile of around 98.
General Knowledge:-
This section was dominated by
current affairs and news discussed in newspapers of last year. There were
about 7 questions related to national and international on-going issues
like Syrian crisis, Crimean referendum, Boko Haram etc. Four questions were
business or economy related. Geography and History had a share of 4
questions and sports was topic in 5 questions. Rest questions were mostly
random questions about India.
Overall, a well-read aspirant should be
able to get a net score of 10+ in this section.
Essay:-
Listening is a
dying art. We hardly listen to understand, we only listen to refute or
reply.
Deep thought. Deeper implications. The topic is extremely contemporary.
Be it the media channels or the parliamentarians or the layman on the
road. Everyone is busy expressing their opinion without a sound
understanding of the topic and hence half baked data or half baked
conclusions seem a common occurrence. With a stronger online penetration,
the effect seems to multiply and the whole gist has been captured in this
one line. XAT, kudos!
And that's all about XAT 2015 analysis.
I feel a sectional score of around 7 in verbal,
around 6 in Decision making & 9 in quant will be good enough for a
sectional cutoff. This means a total of around 22 would take care of a
93-94 percentile. However for an aspirant to sit comfortable, he would
have to sit with a score of around 32+ for him to reach a score of 98+
percentile so that he can cash in during the final admissions
stage.
College wise cut offs:
| College Name |
Expected cut-off / marks |
| XLRI BM/HR |
22+ |
| SP Jain |
26+ |
| XIMB |
22+ |
| IMT-G |
18+ |
| GIM |
17+ |
| LIBA |
15+ |
| TAPMI |
14+ |
| IFMR |
14+ |
About the Author
About the Author
Parasharan Chari
COO, Endeavor Careers
Parasharan Chari is an alumnus of SP Jain and is currently serving as the chief operating officer at Endeavor Careers and is also associated with the design and development of its online testing portal CatGurus.com
Comments
(2)
M
8 years ago
Report Abuse
Reply to Monitoring
9 years ago
Report Abuse
Reply to pratheep thangaraj
M
8 years ago
Report Abuse