UGC Secretary Urges District-Level Anti-Ragging Committees to Curb Menace

The letter underscores the gravity of ragging as a criminal offense and highlights the legal framework established by the Supreme Court of India

In a proactive move to tackle the persistent issue of ragging in higher education institutions, Prof. Manish R. Joshi, Secretary of the University Grants Commission (UGC), has issued a compelling directive. In a recent communication addressed to higher education institutions across the nation, Prof. Joshi has emphasized the urgent need to establish district-level anti-ragging committees.

The letter underscores the gravity of ragging as a criminal offense and highlights the legal framework established by the Supreme Court of India in its landmark judgment dated 08.05.2009. In accordance with the powers vested under the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, the UGC has enacted the "Regulations on Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, 2009."

Asserting the mandatory nature of these regulations, Prof. Joshi reiterates the imperative for all institutions to fully implement and adhere to the prescribed measures aimed at prohibiting, preventing, and eliminating ragging. Any violation of these regulations will be met with serious consequences, as outlined in the UGC Regulations for Curbing the Menace of Ragging — 2009.

Of particular significance is the directive for the formation of district-level anti-ragging committees, comprising key stakeholders such as District Collectors, university/college/institution heads, law enforcement representatives, media personnel, and members of non-governmental organizations involved in youth development programs. These committees are tasked with ensuring vigilance and proactive intervention to address incidents falling within the purview of ragging.

Furthermore, institutions are urged to conduct preparatory meetings during the summer vacation period to assess their readiness and compliance with regulatory directives. Prof. Joshi emphasizes the importance of organizing publicity campaigns to raise awareness about the criminality of ragging and the punitive actions awaiting perpetrators.

In conclusion, Prof. Joshi reiterates the unequivocal stance of the UGC and the legal system regarding ragging as a criminal offense. The message is clear: there will be no tolerance for any form of ragging, and stringent punitive measures will be enforced to uphold the safety and dignity of students in higher education institutions.