Malla Reddy Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty Details & Reviews ,Hyderabad

Faculty: The faculty at the college is exceptional, comprising highly educated, helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable teachers. They are well-trained and possess remarkable talent. Moreover, the college ensures that the course curriculum is regularly updated to meet the latest standards. Additionally, the exams are designed to be easily passable, with a minimum passing mark of 28 in all subjects.

Faculty: The teachers were friendly, helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They are qualified with Masters, which are MS and M forms. Yes, this course is curriculum-relevant and makes the students ready for industrial practices. The semester exams are not more difficult but also not too easy, and the pass percentage is above 70%.

Faculty: Highly educated, helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable teachers. Moreover, the college ensures that the course curriculum is regularly updated to meet the latest standards The faculty at the college is exceptional, The teachers were friendly, helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They are qualified with Masters, which are MS and M forms.

Faculty: Lecturers are very helpful and knowledgeable, the teaching quality is good, the course curriculum is relevant and makes the students a bit knowledgeable, and during the course time the students are having the industry visit. Also, the semester exams are not so difficult, and the pass percentage will be good.

Faculty: We have freshers mainly who completed their course as our faculty members in our college. This course definitely would make students industry-ready. Students have a great knowledge regarding the medical field and counseling patients. The pass percentage is good enough.

Faculty: The faculty members are experienced and well-versed and knowledgeable. They make us understand every aspect of the subject clearly. The pass percentage of our college is too good. In fact, the pass percentage of my class is 80-90%. The faculty teach us in simple language so that we can write answers on our own.

Faculty: Exams are good, and the curriculum is standard. Faculty members are average. The down part is that there were no separate qualified faculty members for Pharma.D. It was the same faculty member as for other courses. I thought it lacked experience and knowledge as a whole, which I think changes now.

Faculty: Staff members here are very qualified for some subjects like pharmacology, clinical pharmacy, medicinal chemistry, but therapeutics is taught by an assistant professor who is not much knowledgeable. The curriculum was pretty relevant to the course, but the course curriculum doesn't contain much knowledgeable content to make students a perfect clinical pharmacist.

Faculty: This course generally deals with the students to get more information about hospital and get accurate with patient's related hospital matters rather than industry-related matters. Teachers were good and competent to provide good knowledge to students both theoretical and practical.

Faculty: Faculty are eligible and very well trained to get students fit for their future. Labs are clean and provide a good area for students to apply their theoretical knowledge into practical. Teaching quality of faculty is one of the plus points in this college.

Faculty: There are qualified, knowledgeable and unqualified lectures on our campus. Qualified lecturers will teach in detail, and even they will provide notes for the respective subject. Unqualified lecturers are waste in terms of teaching. The course curriculum is not relevant as we don't have such industrial visits, and only medical camps will be provided.

Faculty: The college has high qualified Lectures. And have high knowledge, the teaching quality is so good. Students who have completed the course get jobs, and they have a high chance to go abroad and can do the masters there.

Faculty: 1. )The teachers were helpful, somewhere qualified and a few were knowledgeable. 2. )This course curriculum makes the students industry ready. 3. )The teaching quality was not bad. 4. )But the teaching quality could be much better. The course curriculum is relevant but I don't think maths needs to be included in it.