Prestige Institute of Management and Research Gwalior Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: In college, the teachers are experienced, and they have a polite nature and high education. There are six semesters in the college, and when they conduct exams, they are fair. The exams are conducted without chances of cheating.

Faculty: The faculty members in this college are well-knowledgeable and supportive whenever you need them. They have their exam criteria good, which contains questions that would be helpful for us further. The pass percentage in this college is 80% or above, based on students' skills.

Faculty: The faculty was helpful and knowledgeable, although a few teachers weren't proficient in our subjects. Courses were always completed before exams. Semester exams were relevant to classroom concepts, and the passing criteria were divided into 40 and 60 marks. Exams were conducted within the college.

Faculty: Teachers are very knowledgeable. The college holds an A+ for education. The exams are quite okay to pass if you just listen to what the teachers taught in class because it's easy to understand when teachers teach with various examples. The patience level of teachers is good; they will answer your questions until you feel satisfied.

Faculty: The teaching quality is high, ensuring good knowledge acquisition. Industrial visits provide essential practical knowledge. The academic workload is manageable with a minimum pass percentage of 33% in end-semester exams.

Faculty: The faculty members in the Institute were pretty good; they always supported and encouraged students in their College-Life. Faculty members of the Institute were also very friendly with the students so that they could get an emotional connection with the students and could help them out at their level.

Faculty: Yes, teachers can be helpful and friendly if you ask directly about your problems or doubts; they can easily give answers and there is a six-month semester in which one time is a midterm examination and a final term examination, that's all.

Faculty: All the faculty are well educated and have PhDs in their field. Smart classes are there and all faculty have well-rounded experience. Exams are held twice: once during the midterm and again during the final exam. You have to pass both the exams and the semester in 6 months.

Faculty: Faculty members are well-qualified and their teaching style is best through presentations, movies, and different methods. Also, the level of teachers is best, either they are NET or Ph.D. pursuing or Ph.D. completed. Also, teachers are very cooperative in nature.

Faculty: The instructors are highly supportive, skilled, and possess extensive knowledge. They also educate us using real-life illustrations. The majority of the faculty members hold a Ph.D. degree and are NEET-qualified. The curriculum offered is pertinent, ensuring that students are prepared for the industry. It maintains a balanced level of difficulty.

Faculty: The instructors possess the necessary qualifications, and the curriculum is designed to align with effective teaching methods. The semester examinations are moderately challenging, striking a balance between difficulty and ease. The passing rate stands at 35%, with over 90% of students successfully clearing each semester.

Faculty: The college's faculty members possess extensive experience, holding postgraduate and doctoral degrees. They offer us both theoretical and practical learning opportunities. Our exams and midterms are conducted in a proper manner, and we are given sufficient time for preparation.

Faculty: Faculty members were well-experienced and helpful. They were very professional at teaching. Few teachers were average. They were very interactive with students. There was no coding culture among students.

Faculty: Our teachers were very supportive. During three years, we encountered almost every teacher. All teachers were helpful. Semester exams were difficult. The course made students industry-ready.

Faculty: Teachers in our college were helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable. Teaching quality was very good. The course curriculum was not relevant. Students had to develop skills on their own for a better future.