Sir M.V. School of Architecture Faculty Details & Reviews ,Yelahanaka, Bangalore

Faculty Reviews

Overall Faculty Rating (Out of 5)

4.0

Based on 1 Verified Reviews

Distribution of Rating

The Verified badge indicates that the reviewer's details have been verified by Shiksha, and reviewers are bona fide students of this college. These reviews and ratings have been given by students. Shiksha does not endorse the same. Out of 3 published reviews, 1 review is verified.
Read reviews that mention
PedagogyTop FacultyCourse Curriculum DesignTeaching ExperienceStudent Faculty ratioKnowledge SharingSupportive FacultyQuality educationVisiting FacultyView All
Very PositivePositiveNeutralNegativeVery Negative
K
Karthik Mani | Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch.) - Batch of 2023
Reviewed on 8 Feb 2020
4.4
Placements 5 Infrastructure 4 Faculty & Course Curriculum 5 Crowd & Campus Life 4 Value for Money 4
Faculty members and infrastructure are the best.

Faculty: Teaching faculty members are the best, and we learn a lot from our teachers. Our teachers hold a double degree and are well-qualified. Teaching quality is 100%. We also have visiting faculty members who are amongst the best architects, and they also conduct workshops regularly, which help us understand more.

Was this review helpful Yes | No  
V
Vamsi Krish | Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch.) - Batch of 2018
Reviewed on 31 Jan 2019
5.0
Placements 5 Infrastructure 5 Faculty & Course Curriculum 5 Crowd & Campus Life 5 Value for Money 5
I miss my college days and faculty was so good.

Faculty: Faculty members are mostly PG qualified and knowledgeable. We give them 5/5 rating. They use different methods for teaching which included projectors. The faculty ratio with the student was good that was also 5/5. The course curriculum was much better.

Was this review helpful Yes | No  
N
Niranjana S | Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch.) - Batch of 2029
Reviewed on 29 Dec 2024
Verified
3.6
Placements 4 Infrastructure 4 Faculty & Course Curriculum 4 Crowd & Campus Life 2 Value for Money 4
Overall, the campus is good, and the way of teaching is good.

Faculty: Faculty members are mostly PG-qualified and knowledgeable. We give them a 5/5 rating. They use different methods for teaching, which include projectors. The faculty ratio with the students was good, and that was also 5/5. The course curriculum was much better.

Was this review helpful Yes | No  

News & Updates

Latest NewsPopular News
Confused about which college or exam to opt for?
  • Chat with our counsellor
  • Get your personalised list of colleges & exams matching your preferences
qna

Student Forum

chatAnything you would want to ask experts?
Write here...