IIIT Una Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Some faculty members are knowledgeable and some are good but overall everyone is quite good at something. Everyone is master of something and one can't deny this fact. Teachers are helpful and qualified and well teaching qaulity is not up to the mark as one would expect but still okay about relevancy of course. I can say that it is somewhat relevant but not as much as one would expect it. It somewhat makes students industry-ready, but to be completely ready one must prepare themselves. Exams are...

Faculty: Most of the faculty members are well-qualified (most have a Ph.D.) and knowledgeable, but the teaching quality is overall subpar. But this is the case with every other college. The course curriculum has some irrelevant subjects which are only taught in the first year. From the second year, only core subjects are taught. I feel the overall course is pretty outdated (but this is again the case with every other college). So to meet the latest industry standards, you have to keep working on yourself...

Faculty: Some faculty members are good, but some are not good at teaching. Although the content covered is up to the mark for good placements and skill development, obviously, a student has to work hard on their own for the skills taught in the course. The curriculum is relevant as of now. The semester exams are medium difficult and not very easy; it depends on the faculty too.

Faculty: Our college follows a strict curriculum and a strict 75% attendance policy. All the faculty members are well qualified and are Ph.D. holders. Many are foreigners, but they will not give you as much importance as any other college. But staff and lab assistants are quite helpful and help us to demonstrate and perform experiments properly. Semester exams had a relatively simple marking scheme and are quite easy and mostly questions come from the PPT provided by the teachers.

Faculty: Faculties are good, and some are damn good in their field, but a few faculties are not that good, and the teaching style is also boring. Course curriculum is according to the needs of modern industry with more practical and hands-on experience courses. Semester exams are fine if you know the concepts; you can easily solve them.

Faculty: Teachers are quite helpful every year. Most of them hold PhDs in their respective fields of study. They teach using both the chalk method and presentations too in the classroom, which helps us, as in many institutions professors just read the slides but here most of the professors are not like that. The course curriculum is new and is updated every year with a focus on industrial skills. As the college is autonomous, the professors and Holds decide the syllabus themselves rather than depending o...

Faculty: The student-to-teacher ratio stands at approximately 15:1, with a majority of teachers holding Ph.D. degrees. The faculty is supportive and proficient. IIIT Una also invites faculty for different guest lectures. The curriculum is well-designed and relevant, making us industry-ready. The college exams are a bit difficult, but it is easy to pass due to the average system used. The evaluation of exams is based on a relatively grading system, which is awesome. The calendar for the academic year is a...

Faculty: The student-to-teacher ratio stands at approximately 15:1, with a majority of teachers holding Ph.D. degrees. The faculty is supportive and proficient. However, some aspects, like lengthy practicum sessions up to the 4th semester, might be perceived as irrelevant. College exams include CT1, CT2 (cycle tests of 20 marks each), and end semesters of 100 marks.

Faculty: The majority of teachers are young and enthusiastic, always ready to assist their students whenever needed. Many of them hold Ph.D. degrees. The curriculum is well-designed, although the absence of BioTechnology in the first semester may raise questions. Throughout the semester, students are assigned numerous tasks and assignments. The grading system is relatively fair.

Faculty: The faculty is very helpful and highly qualified. More than 60% of the faculty are Ph.D. holders, and all are very knowledgeable. The curriculum is relevant to the courses and makes us industry-ready. The semester exams are a bit difficult, and most of the students pass them easily with good grades.

Faculty: Teachers who are occupied for this course are very good and knowledgeable. Many of them completed their graduation from foreign universities. The curriculum for this course is perfect. Every exam is easy for a student who prepares for it very well. So the exam level for all students is above average.

Faculty: Almost all teachers in our college are well-qualified with degrees like Ph.D. and M.Tech from renowned institutions like IITs and NITs. The exam pattern and exam dates are fixed. Our college follows a relative grading system, emphasizing not just individual marks but also the performance compared to other students in the same branch.

Faculty: Just a heads-up, some of the material can be pretty advanced, so it's good to do a bit of prep before class. Overall, the teaching is solid, engaging, and pushes you to dig deeper. The first-year syllabus is broad, giving a taste of different fields alongside the technical stuff. It's a good way to get a feel for what else you might want to explore down the line. Exams aren't crazy hard if you keep up with your studies. The college uses relative grading, so how well you do depends on how the res...

Faculty: The pass percentage is great. All the teachers are well-qualified. There will be some extra subjects like biotechnology, but other than that, the course curriculum is very much relevant. Semester exams are not very difficult, and the average system makes it easier.

Faculty: Teachers are mostly young and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is below average. The course contains Biotech, which is irrelevant to the IT branch, but in the second year, many good courses are available that are relevant. Semester exams are not that difficult to pass; just make sure you have 75% attendance.