Pacific College of Engineering Faculty Details & Reviews ,Udaipur

Faculty: Teachers were helpful. Staff were not available for all the courses. There was always a shortage of faculty members. Teaching methods were good. We didn't get industry exposure. The course curriculum was average. The faculty to student ratio was 1:30. Teaching quality of senior faculty members was better than others. Our HOD taught us ISS subject.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college were not that good. But when I was in the last year of my course, the faculty members were changed, and all the new teachers were very good. They also had good knowledge. I am glad to have had teachers like them. The course curriculum was designed by RTU, and it was not enough to avail jobs.

Faculty: The well-experienced faculty members are a few in the college. The faculty members who have experience are good in their respective subject. Some faculty members just have a B.Tech degree are teaching. Some have M-tech degree, but many are just B.Tech pass out students. The college should recruit good and experienced faculty members.

Faculty: Teachers are so good, well mannered and well qualified and they have a source of knowledge which they are fully trying to provide the students. As the fees high one would not satisfied by the college. There main motto is only to pass out the students not the job oe there future.

Faculty: Teachers was good only Because all faculty was recently pass out from his Bachelor degree so they didn't know about good teaching. We went for industry visit 2 times in 4 year in Bachelor degree, they use not good teaching method, course was good but teaching method was not good.

Faculty: The teachers especially play an important role in the college. They are all well-qualified, everyone is far better than others. They are helpful in every aspect whether it is about studies or any other matters. They all are well qualified with an exposure of 4 years in a very good industry.

Faculty: They have enough faculty to carry out the courses. Faculty are well knowledge and expertise in courses field and subjects. They provide enough guidance and support for final year projects and technical help also. We are satisfied with all the faculty members except few.

Faculty: Some faculty for the civil department is the best. They are good in their field. They are well-experienced and well-knowledgeable. The course curriculum should focus more on practical learning rather than be passing the exam only. The teaching method of some faculty members is the best. In the civil engineering, one cannot find better faculty, other than this college. The practicals are less but better when compared to others for civil engineering.

Faculty: The college has a well-experienced faculty, and some of them are the PhD holders. All the teachers help to enhance the future of the students and help them to be bright students in the courses like the BBA, MBA, B.Tech, M.Tech, B.Sc, M.Sc, B.A, M.A, which are there in one university.

Faculty: The faculty of my college was very helpful knowledgeable and experienced. They used to help the students with every possible solution they could provide. I went for an industrial visit with the faculty and it was very much helpful. I am very thankful to all the staff and faculty members of my college.

Faculty: The chemistry between the faculty and the student is excellent. The faculty members of Pacific college of engineering is helpful, once there was a sir engagement program but still helping the student for the exam preparation on the phone. Such a great sir, he is for me. Monthly industry tours are arranged for the mechanical students.

Faculty: The faculty of the college is not experienced and keeps on changing frequently. They are helpful but less knowledgeable. Classroom teaching and practicals are preferred the most in the college. The student to teacher ratio is around 22:1. Very less industrial exposure is given. The course curriculum is also not very helpful.

Faculty: My experience with the faculty was average. Few faculty members were not qualified and the others were also average. The teaching methods used by the faculty were not innovative. The student to faculty ratio is 24:1. We get the least industry exposure. The course curriculum was not very useful as per the expectations.

Faculty: The faculty members were not at all good as they were just the pass outs and were doing their masters, so had no idea of how to teach and tackle the problems. The textbooks given were actually helpful and that was a good thing. There was no help given from the HOD of the subject when in need of help.