Pydah Group Faculty Details & Reviews ,Andhra Pradesh - Other

Faculty: Teachers in our college are not capable of teaching. Teaching quality is below average. The course curriculum is relevant but does not make students industry ready. Semester exams are difficult to pass. The pass percentage is less than 30%.

Faculty: Our teachers are the worst in explaining the subjects. Faculties are highly qualified from top universities and are knowledgeable. In mechanical engineering department, the students visit the industry for gaining knowledge.

Faculty: Some of the faculty really interact with the students. They help in subject learning and conduct events like the College Pydahkranthi event, which is very beautiful. The semester exams are very strict, but the preparation planning of the college is good. They conduct Mid 1 and 2 exams to practice before the semester exam.

Faculty: Teachers in our college were helpful and friendly. They motivate students very well and explained topics in an easy manner. Industrial visits were provided for students every year. Exams conducted were tough. Around 70% is the pass percentage every year. Our college prefers online course internships every year.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is good enough. The course curriculum is relevant. It makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are difficult. The pass percentage is nearly 40%.

Faculty: Teachers have good knowledge. Their teaching quality is also good enough. The course curriculum is relevant. It makes the student industry ready. Semester exams are difficult to pass. Nearly 20-30 percentage students only pass in the semester.

Faculty: Good teachers and good teaching. Teachers are friendly to our students, and the teachers are qualified for PhD., M.Tech, and M.Sc. and excellent knowledge are good teaching qualities in Mechanical courses, ECE, CSE, and agricultural engineering courses. 75%of the pass percentage in semester exams in my college.

Faculty: The teaching quality of teachers is awesome. Some of the faculty members are bad and very strict. The curriculum is good. Semester exams are very difficult. The pass percentage is 75%. The industry provides inputs to colleges to frame the curriculum to suit their needs, based on which colleges train students. These courses not only make students understand how the industry works but also help organisations train students for their needs.

Faculty: Faculty members are good in our college. The teaching quality is good. Our course curriculum makes students ready for the industry.

Faculty: Our department has efficient faculty members. The pass percentage is average. Semester exams are difficult. Students should study well to avoid distractions.

Faculty: In some branches, there are no faculty members. This is the mistake of the management as they are not paying the salaries no lecturers are willing to come. They are appointing lecturers who are passed out from our college in the previous year. We can't expect more from them.

Faculty: I'm not at all satisfied with the faculty. They'll just work for their sake, and they don't bother about the students' career. They don't want to make students learn the concepts well. Even some departments don't have any staff. There are no skilled tutors out there.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college are highly educated. Their way of teaching was average. Mostly maximum number of faculty members have completed their masters. However, the teachers are very well educated, but they do not make students industry-ready.

Faculty: Talking about the faculty, they are too jovial with the students. They blend up and interact with the students well. Ths student to faculty ratio is 30:1. They are well-qualified.

Faculty: The good faculty is available for the agricultural engineering department. They also have more good labs for everyone else this communication including attachments for students and students club is also there. Some clubs are available for agro students. The club recently launched its website.