Sir Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Nashik

Faculty: I am satisfied with the faculty members. Our faculty members are good and helpful. The teaching quality is good. The course curriculum is relevant. The exam questions are related to courses. Many students score a 9 CGPA. They conduct practical classes regularly. Exams are conducted strictly.

Faculty: It is good while facing semester exams. The pass percentage is 70% to 80%. Semester exams are good because of the 2 or 3 practice exams conducted by the college. They provide a question set for the final exam. So students are not confused while facing an exam and that's why the pass percentage is good.

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified, have proper communication skills that are helpful to students, and have great knowledge and expertise. Yes, the course is well designed to face real-world challenges. Semester exams are difficult as there is strict environment during exams and discipline is maintained. The passing percentage is 69 percent .

Faculty: All the faculty are good. They make students eligible to work for a better future in the industry. The college is not much good for placements.

Faculty: Definitely the professors teaching here are post graduates and teaching from many years. They are sufficiently qualified and knowledgeable. Specially, for the mechanical students, they need not worry regarding the quality of teaching in SVIT as far as University Level Exams are concerned. But if you are targeting for GATE ESE level Exams, you need to definitely rely on coaching institutes since they are exam specific and it is obviously not possible for any college (except IITs and NITs) to comp...

Faculty: The teachers are both helpful and qualified, with most having cleared the GATE exam and possessing years of teaching experience. They excel in knowledge. The course includes practical sessions on designing tools like CAD/CAM and CATIA, focusing on emerging industry skills. While exams are challenging, around 80% of our class manages to pass.

Faculty: Teachers were not as per the expectations and I don't think the course curriculum made us industry ready. We have to study a lot of things after our course that should have covered during our engineering. They did not make us technically strong.

Faculty: All the faculty members are well qualified. The lecture quality is very good. 360 degree of practical knowledge are provided. There are various relevant events held in the college. Teachers are very helpful and good in nature. They don't have the wrong attitude.

Faculty: There are well-qualified staff members in our college. As I am from the computer department, staff members in our department are very helpful and always try to provide practical knowledge. Their teaching quality is good. They use proper presentation and demos. Various training programs are arranged for personality development, stress management, etc.

Faculty: Teachers here are helpful, well qualified and knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is very good. This course curriculum is relevant, and it makes students industry-ready. We learnt about telecommunication as well as IoT system. In the last year, we did a project named air pollution monitoring system using IoT, and it was the industry needed project.

Faculty: Most of the teachers here are PhD holders in subjects and much more helpful in terms of any project or practical knowledge part. They are very much experienced and knows very well. They try to deliver knowledge and make every student ready for their industrial phase.

Faculty: Our department also has well-qualified faculty members. Our department HOD is a PhD holder and has two patent registered on his name. Other faculty members are pursuing a PhD, and even some teachers published a textbook. Our department organised national-level events, seminars and workshops for students.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college are good. Teachers keep good relation with the students, but top management is not good. HOD have very poor knowledge about his own seat and does not have any quality to become a HOD. He does not take any good decisions for students. Because of this, students do not get proper technical knowledge.

Faculty: The college has the best faculty members, and almost all staff members were qualified with the PhD. They are well-experienced. They try to share as much knowledge as they can. The entire syllabus is completed on time, i.e. before the exams. Proper guidance is given for exams and career.

Faculty: The faculty in our college are cooperative and good, but some faculty are not up to the mark. All the faculty members from all departments are very cooperative, kind, and very helpful for students. The quality of their teaching is good. The faculty are highly qualified. Some of them also have rich industry experience.