Dr. HBSU Faculty Details & Reviews ,Churchgate, Mumbai

Faculty: Teachers are very good; they are so kind and calm, and ready to explain to students for the millionth time. Yes, it makes the students industry-ready. As per the new NEP, internals passing marks are 50%, and external marks are 50%. Internals are quite hard; it's not that easy to pass, and you have to work hard.

Faculty: Faculty members here are very qualified and helpful. They solve the doubts of students irrespective that the doubt is silly or difficult. This course curriculum is relevant for students having interest in the field of accounting, taxation and auditing. There are 6 semesters and also the admission is quite quick and easy.

Faculty: Faculty of the college is not so good but most of the professors are very helpful. Also, they give importance to extracurricular activities which help students to grow in all fields. Examination of the college is not that tough. It is moderate.

Faculty: The teachers are very professional and qualified, with a high degree of industry knowledge and capabilities. The curriculum is well planned and covers most of the technical skills required in the IT sector today. The exams are averagely difficult, and the passing percentage is absolute.

Faculty: The teachers at Sydenham College are well qualified and knowledgeable. The course curriculum is not only theoretical but also practical, and provides management students with hands-on training in real-life scenarios. The exams are quite challenging, and students are given their CGPA, which is visible in the students' diary app.

Faculty: The teaching staff of the college is very good The teachers are very helfull They are very generous The college is under dr.homi bhabha university The college conducts exams in semester model The college refers Manan prakshan books for bcom The collge passing percentage is 75%

Faculty: The teaching of professors is efficient and effective. If you pay attention in class, you won’t have to worry much during exams. The faculty members are highly qualified, with some having completed their PhDs. The teaching methods are designed to prepare students for real-world situations.

Faculty: All teachers are top class, more inclined towards practical approach. Assignments and practical writeup are more; it needs to be reduced. Teachers' mindset is Chemistry is not taught; we have to learn it. DHBSU is our university curriculum, and academic activities are conducted as per them. Exams are always difficult; questions come from reference books.

Faculty: The faculty has poor teaching skills and is not well-knowledgeable on the given subject. The teaching quality is average at best and the curriculum formed for this particular course is very poorly developed. The department doesn't have a proper HOD, so there is literally no one to listen to your complaints about the poor management or study style. Studying this course will not give the students any scope in the bioinformatics industry.

Faculty: Faculty of our college were helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They were offering good quality teaching to their students. Course curriculum followed at our college was relevant and it was making the students job-ready. Semester exams were not very difficult and pass percentage was 90%.

Faculty: The faculty is quite nice. Each and every faculty member is so supportive. Each of the professors is a well-educated and well-living person. The only thing is that they do not take responsibility if you want to study, and if you want to learn from them, you have to approach them.

Faculty: Teachers are good. Few teachers have worked in MNCs. The course curriculum is relevant. If you study well, you can pass exams with good marks. The pass percentage is 50%.

Faculty: The teachers were qualified for our course they were very helpful and supporting throughout the course they always helped us. This course does make you industry ready and also makes you eligible for competitive exams. The semester exams were moderate not so hard not so easy the Pass percentage was above 90 percent.

Faculty: Teachers in our course were quite good and cooperative with students. Although there was always an exception. Attendance had never been an issue in our college. Some of the teachers were quite lethargic because of their age. They were neither very productive nor do they have the zeal for teaching.

Faculty: Teachers were good and always one step ahead to help their students. Some teachers were not interested in communicating with students, but some were good. The course curriculum is relevant for future students, and it makes students industry-ready, and the exams are difficult, and about 60%of students clear all subjects.