DY Patil College of Architecture Faculty Details & Reviews ,Akurdi, Pune

Faculty: Faculty members and curriculum are good here, as you get well-skilled faculty members in architecture. Teaching quality is good. The course curriculum is good as there is enough balance between classroom and practical study in architecture. The curriculum is on par with industry standards so its quite effective. Semester exams are moderately difficult and the pass criteria is a minimum of 35%.

Faculty: Teachers are quite helpful in our college. They help us solve doubts all the time. Semesters are difficult in our college. The course is relevant as the students are ready do internship or do job anywhere outside. As they teach us the best of our course.

Faculty: Teaching and non-teaching staff are both very supportive. Teaching faculty helps in every subject. They don't hesitate to recall every topic during exam time. The course curriculum is based on the guidelines of the Council of Architecture and under the SPPU rules. Exams are not so hard as it is mostly based on sessional work, but students have to complete their work on time to get a pass.

Faculty: There are good faculty members for all the subjects. They are well-knowledgeable, and they have very good practical knowledge. Mostly, they explain with the help of examples which make the students understand the concepts better. It is our pleasure to have such faculty members. They always stay in our minds with their teaching skills and research skills.

Faculty: The visiting faculty members are very good, with immensely knowledgeable teaching. Most of the senior core faculty members are good, but being based on quality based evaluation, it is important for the students on be in the good books of the teachers, as they only decide everything.

Faculty: The college is not having very good teachers during our course of time, but from the collaboration of the college with an international university, the faculty is improving day by day. In our final year in the college, a lot of new faculty members were very good. Overall, there are good staff and faculty.

Faculty: The faculty members are good and qualified. They use the different media for teaching. The student to faculty ratio is 20:1. The exposure was good in the field of architecture. The classrooms are good with proper ventilation and lighting. The classrooms are spacious. The size of the classroom is around 200 sq.m for 60 students.

Faculty: The teachers were indeed helpful. The college has a combination of experienced teachers to help us with their teaching experience and a fresh faculty to help us with their new design ideas. Each subject has a minimum of two faculty members to cater a class of significant strength.

Faculty: Teaching staff in architecture department is a mix of seniors as well as junior faculty members. The junior faculty members are not that trained and professional or can be said behaving to be over professional to the students here in order to rule the post and getting an image of self-dominance.

Faculty: The faculty members are well-managed except some of the faculty members, all the others will give the best to the students. Each classroom contains a projector that helps the students to the better understanding. The student to faculty ratio is good, and I am not saying that best. The cource curriculum is useful to all the students. I love to refer the friends to join this college.

Faculty: The real issue with dyp is faculty members. The faculty members here aren't capable of teaching skills. The major drawback about the college is this section. The faculty members change every semester. Let's say, while the time I graduate I believe there won't be more than 5 faculty members that taught me still linked with the college. 35 faculty members are always new. This is terrifying.