Gokula Krishna College of Engineering Faculty Details & Reviews ,Nellore

Faculty: All have good, experienced faculty, a friendly nature, full-clear explanations, are polite, and are well educated. Those who consider all students his or her own children are moving free with students. We enjoy the class a lot and are happy. Thus, I am grateful and extremely proud to have such a great faculty.

Faculty: Faculty members here are very friendly with students, and they will support us in every aspect like both personally and subject wise. At the time I am pursuing, faculty members were well-stuffed. But now I came to know that they are moving out of our college due to salary issues. The course curriculum of our university is always very close to industry practice. We have more practical knowledge here.

Faculty: The faculty in our college, especially in our course, is excellent. Their teaching quality is exceptional, as they explain each topic in various ways, providing valuable assistance to students. Additionally, they offer online classes to address any doubts regarding subjects. Semester exams are not conducted at this college.

Faculty: Teachers in our college are qualified, but they are not highly knowledgeable. They will not clarify any doubts of the students. Their teaching quality is below-average. The course curriculum is not revalent. Students get less knowledge when compared with the other colleges. There should be an improvement in the change of faculty members in the college.

Faculty: Faculty members lack basic knowledge. They are not well qualified. Students who have completed their B.Tech from this college are hired as faculty. The student-faculty ratio is very poor. No proper teaching method is followed. They don't provide any industry exposure, nor they organise any industrial visits. The course curriculum followed in our college is not useful.

Faculty: Teachers help to improve our skills, and the faculty is highly skilled in technology with good teaching skills and knowledge. Yes, of course, many students are industry-ready because the college curriculum supports achieving good percentages. The pass percentage is a minimum of 80%.

Faculty: The faculty members of electronic and communication engineering were much better than any other branches in the college. The HOD takes care of their respective branch. The faculty were good, but some of the faculty members are coming to pass the time. There are only 12-13 faculty members in ECE and diploma ECE departments.

Faculty: Teachers are B.Tech passed outs. Few M.Tech faculty too not very well qualified. Nothing new in teaching methods. No industry exposure. Course curriculum is based on JNTU Ananthapur which is the same old one. Not at all updated. People preparing for GATE are working as faculty.

Faculty: The faculty in this college were all B.Tech students who don't have any experience but the mechanical HOD will be the best for the college. No other departments have such a head of department in the college. There is no scope for projects in the college, even though you have to.

Faculty: My college experience was very good but the faculty members on the college campus are the worst, though there were a few faculty members who are very extraordinary and knowledgeable. The student-faculty ratio is very low. I didn't get the industry exposure but the course was somewhat useful for my career. I didn't shine in the theoretical part but I am well-polished with the practical knowledge.

Faculty: Teachers are very much helpful, but some teachers are not well qualified, only few members having very good knowledge in subjects, teaching quality is moderate. manual teaching and projected based teaching are happening, students to teacher ratio is good. we cannot find much industry exposure. Course curriculum is moderate and satisfactory.

Faculty: There is a no good faculty members. any faculty didn't speak in English and courses provided are B.Tech, Diploma, MBA, MCA and M.Tech. there are no qualified and knowledgeable teachers. teaching quality is average and teaching method used in text books. student and faculty ratio is 3:1.