Shri Baba Mast Nath Engineering College Faculty Details & Reviews ,Rohtak

Faculty: For core engineering subjects, there are permanent teachers, but for other subjects like maths, physics, etc., there are no permanent teachers. So, our college invites guest teachers from other universities. Permanent teachers are friendly, and they will try to help you if you approach them for any problem.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college are quite good except for some teachers. All other teachers are good and have in-depth knowledge of their respective subjects. I like the friendly nature of teachers, but one cannot decide to join the college only based on that. We need labs, assistance and quality infrastructure. Hence, joining the college only for good faculty members is not a good choice. The fee structure is low indeed compared to other colleges in Rohtak. So, if the fee is the only issue, I th...

Faculty: The faculty and the curriculum are not good, and there are no dedicated faculty members. Any faculty member teaches any of the subjects. One faculty member teaches 4-5 subjects, which is not good for students. The faculty members use old and traditional methods of teaching. They just read the books instead of explaining the concepts.

Faculty: The faculty of our college are incompetent to provide proper education and to answer the queries of students. There is no industry exposure provided by the college in any sense. The teaching methods implemented are old and insufficient.

Faculty: The faculty is good and bad as well. Most of the faculty members are knowledgeable whereas some are not. Since some teachers are not friendly to the students, they keep on blaming them for unnecessary reasons. The HODs are good and well mannered, but sometimes when they lose temper, they behave rudely with the students. Some teachers are very knowledgeable whereas some are not. The communication gap is often seen between the students and the teachers due to the ego of the teachers.

Faculty: The teachers were helpful and qualified but are only theory based and not practical. Their teaching quality was average not best. Their teaching methods were blackboard, discussion and presentations. The student to faculty ratio was 12:1. I didn't get any industry exposure.

Faculty: The faculty team of the college was not experienced. The teachers were forced to teach the subject of which they do not have sufficient knowledge because of the lack of faculty members. Only theoretical knowledge was given here, and the faculty members are also not qualified. Freshers were appointed as a lecturer, as two of our batchmates were appointed as a lecturer here. Some of our teachers were pursuing masters from the same college.