University Institute of Technology, Bhopal - Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalay Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Their teachers are very polite in nature, and they provide much of their experience. Their teachers are very experienced, and they have much knowledge of their field. They also provide electives or optional courses or let students choose their course based on their interest.

Faculty: Yes, the teachers in my course were highly educated and appreciable. They are mostly graduates from good colleges, so they have extremely good knowledge about the curriculum as they are very experienced. Yes, course curriculum is pretty good. But it won't make you industry-ready until you do an internship. Talking about difficult level, it's moderate, neither too east nor to difficult. Pass percentage is almost 95%.

Faculty: Teachers will be very helpful. In my college, the passing percentage is 40%; it can be achievable for those students who are having some seriousness for their future & who want to become successful.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful to students, and the teaching quality is good. The teachers are well qualified and have great knowledge in their subjects. The course curriculum is relevant, and the difficult of the semester exams are tough, and pass percentage is above 80%.

Faculty: All the teachers are very good in nature, they are very helpful, and the teachers have a lot of knowledge in their field subject and in other things as well. They will understand the problems of students and guide them very linearly, and all are very good in qualifications. Their teaching quality is excellent. Yes, the course curriculum is very much relevant. It makes the student industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate, and almost 99 percent of students will pass the exams; only a few are le...

Faculty: There are many useless college teachers who do not even know how to teach. All of them are Ph.D. holders, and they just help the students pass. All the teachers have only two to three years of experience. But some teachers are too good, with a lot of experience and knowledge of their subjects.

Faculty: The teachers are very supportive and guide us in the right way; they are highly qualified and each of them has the Ph.D. degree as their minimum qualification. They have a good way of teaching. Overall, the quality of teaching is good. Yes, the curriculum designed for this course is good; it makes students ready for industries. One thing that needs to be improved is to provide practical classes along with good theoretical classes. Exams that are held after every semester, I mean end-semester exa...

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, but they are not so qualified. Most of the faculty are on a contract basis. They have a basic understanding of the engineering subjects. They are not well-equipped with the knowledge needed for top-level college. Course curriculum is well-designed to be industry-ready. Syllabus fulfills industry norms. Semester exams are difficult. The level of exam paper is high and the copies are strictly checked.

Faculty: In this college, some of the teachers are permanent, some are guest faculty, and some are Ph.D. scholars. They have very good teaching skills. There are two semesters each year and a total of eight semesters in the course. Three mid-semester exams and one end-semester exam are conducted here. The main exam is worth 105 marks. The exam paper is not very hard; you can pass it easily.

Faculty: The teachers were very qualified and knowledgeable, and the teaching quality was very good. The semester exam was not difficult because of the teachers. The semester exam was very simple because of the teacher and his teaching style. Teachers behavior was very good.

Faculty: Teachers are rude but some are helpful. There are mostly 1 to 3 teachers who guide students and the rest of them do not care, they come, teach and go. If teachers guide students well then they might get on the right path. But they do not talk about outside campus selection and all.

Faculty: College faculty is very experienced. They support you in every aspects for your higher studies, sports and knowledge. There are two or more teachers for a particular subjects. There are three mid semester, a quiz, practical and final semester exam in a particular semester.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified and knowledgeable. They can help you particularly with your research work. They are good at teaching and providing guidance. The course curriculum is not very relevant, as it has more subjective subjects than practical subjects, but overall the course is decent and does offer some industry-level knowledge. Semester exams are moderately tough and can be easily cracked by practicing previous year's questions. Almost everyone is able to pass the exams.

Faculty: The teachers here are PhD holders. Their teaching style is boring or old. They are lazy to teach us. Yes, sometimes teachers take us to industry, which helps us a lot. In a semester exam, students should get 33 marks out of 105. A semester is easy according to me; students should be serious about studying.

Faculty: The facilities are good but there could be better quality facilities. The way of teaching is not very effective, as they doesn't seem to grab the attention of all the students and make the learning interesting. But if we need any help, then we can approach them and they'll be happy to help. The students and teachers ratio is about 1:16 so it is good. Our respected teachers provided us with a lot of support and help, which also motivated us to go for higher studies further. Their teaching methods...