Central University of Haryana Faculty Details & Reviews ,Haryana - Other

Faculty: The picture award department sir well qualified and knowledgeable. They deliver a good education to the students and make them ready for the next phase of their life. We have a good syllabus and the course curriculum is relevant and does make sense for the students to get ready for the Next phase of life. The semester exams are not that much difficult there normally based on our syllabus.

Faculty: Yes, the teachers are very helpful, knowledgeable, and well qualified. They teach perfectly. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant, and it will definitely make the students industry-ready. Exams are not very tough. And the passing percentage is more than 90 percent.

Faculty: Teachers are very good in nature and best according to the students and all have good knowledge and are very helpful to students. Semester exams are very hard; around 70-80% students pass the exams. Curriculum is not so relevant and does not make the students industry-ready.

Faculty: Faculty is in enough number to engage classes without any interruption. The faculty I have liked the most is our principal sir Mr. Patil, who is a big encouragement for the students. He grants all the needs a student and a faculty wants. The faculty I dislike is our sports sir Mr. Patil. He has a complex of comparison between students and only sees his profit out of our results and doesn't support us for anything, although I have made achievements in my sport.

Faculty: The faculty members are all well qualified and have done the Ph.D. from recognised institutes. The course is still in development phase but good for new computer Science field. The students are taught DSA, Computer Network as well as Machines Learning in their course.

Faculty: The faculty members of institute are well-qualified from IITs and NITs. The course curriculum is based on the UGC norms. The semester exams conducted by the institute are of moderate level, which thoroughly check the skills learned by students during the timeline of the course.

Faculty: The university follows the UGC curriculum, which is excellent. Every teacher is highly qualified, with a minimum of 8-10 years of experience. The semester exams are very easy, and all the teachers are very helpful. The minimum passing mark is 40.

Faculty: I enrolled in an M.Sc. Chemistry course at Haryana University. I would like to share my thoughts about the curriculum in terms of relevance. The course curriculum strikes a good balance between both practical and theoretical knowledge. The academic syllabus also helps in gaining knowledge of real-world applications. I think they need to improve to align with trends in current technology.

Faculty: All the teachers and faculty members are qualified and knowledgeable. There are many courses available. Exams are held in two semesters per year. The overall difficulty level of semester exams is average, and the passing percentage for all types of exams is 40%.

Faculty: We have well-qualified teachers with a friendly nature. The course curriculum is as per the IIT curriculum. The levels of the exams are good. A minimum of 40 marks is required for a student to clear any exam out of 100, which is good. 75% attendance is mandatory and there are 5 marks for attendance as well.

Faculty: The teachers are well-qualified and have great knowledge about the subject. The course curriculum is also relevant. The semester exams are easy if you study seriously. The pass percentage is about 70 percent. Students who fail in the exam can recheck their papers if they have doubts regarding their marks.

Faculty: Nobody is interested in teaching—they just make presentations and read or show PDFs of books and read. It’s even worse when they give you whole chapters as assignments to write down on your own. Grading is completely biased towards prioritizing local students over those coming from other states.

Faculty: Faculty: Some faculty members are great and have good knowledge, while others have very good research work. Most of the faculty members are helpful. The exam pattern includes both internal and external examinations. In internal examinations, assignments, quizzes, and presentations are all worth 30 marks each, and the theory paper is worth 70 marks, totaling 100 marks. The level of the exams is moderate.

Faculty: The faculty is good, experienced and helpful. I think the curriculum can be improved by making it more oriented towards competitive examinations so it can help students. The semester exam tasks questions from the syllabus itself and the majority makes it through it.

Faculty: The course curriculum is relevant to the practical world, industries, and research. Teachers are qualified and are always willing to help their students. The semester exam level is above moderate, with a focus on testing real-world-based problems.