Institute of Home Economics Faculty Details & Reviews ,Hauz khas

Faculty: Teachers focus only on some specializations but not all, which feels very biased. Faculty and curriculum are nice. Exams are conducted aptly. Teachers are well-educated and teach interestingly. Notes and previous year's questions are provided simultaneously. Doubts are open to be cleared. Even internal exams and practicals are conducted fairly.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and well-qualified. The teaching quantity is very good and helpful. They provide notes and books. The course curriculum is relevant. There are 5 departments like communication, human development, resource management, fashion fabric, and food science. Semester exams are very easy.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful. They can help to solve our doubts if we ask them but they don't teach properly. Most of the time classes got cancelled due to the availability of teachers or sometimes they are too busy. They teach mostly from the ppts or their own study material.

Faculty: The faculty is helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, providing notes sufficient for exams. Serious preparation even a week before exams can result in good marks. While some teachers integrated new industry-relevant examples, the course curriculum feels outdated and requires update to align with modern industrial needs. Exams are not very difficult, and about 85?95% of students pass comfortable, often scoring well with diligent effort.

Faculty: Faculty members are helpful. Some of them are arrogant and rude, and they don't help students well. The teachers are average, but the guest lecturers are good in their research and teaching. Their teaching methods are good, and they are well aware of the news and updates from overseas. Exams have 3 modes: internals, practicals, and the board exam.

Faculty: The teacher are very knowledgeable, but some can be a little bit rude and strict. Additional, some faculty members provide notes, while others do not. This course is relevant for students who want to pursue careers in fashion and textile, food and nutrition, human resources management, and communication development and extension fields. The semester exam are not too difficult to pass, you can easily score well if you study. The passing marks are 36%.

Faculty: Teachers are hardworking. Sometimes, they may seem rude but end up helping us in the long run only. The curriculum is good. The course is relevant, but it should have more industry knowledge. Semester exams are not very tough, but you need to study though. The last year's pass percentage was 91%, which is pretty high.

Faculty: The course curriculum is certainly satisfying. There is a lot of scope and different things all together to explore and learn. Teachers are highly supportive and knowledgeable. The exam pattern is easy to follow and understandable.

Faculty: Most of the teachers are highly qualified experts in their respective fields and well-versed with the curriculum. Teaching quality is excellent. Curriculum is adequate for a bachelor's level course. Teachers frequently discuss industry-relevant topics. Semester exams are not difficult for students who stay consistent with their studies throughout the semester. It is not hard to score 7 GPA, which can be improved to 8+ with extra effort. However, the internal exams can be overwhelming for some st...

Faculty: Our college provide students with a strong foundation in Home Science, Microbiology, Biotechnology, B.El.Ed., and more. Courses span four years, with a balanced mix of theory, practical work, industry exposure, and research opportunities.

Faculty: Only a few professors were knowledgeable and qualified in teaching. Most of them were not making great efforts to provide education. Also, the course curriculum wasn't relevant that much; it needs to be advanced. It doesn't make industry ready. The semester exams are intermediately tough. Pass percentage is the same for different colleges. At least 50% is required to pass.

Faculty: While the teaching quality is inconsistent, with some faculty failing to upskill students, the exams are notably strict. It’s hard to study the entire syllabus as there’s little emphasis on practical learning or improving students’ journalism skills. However, a few qualified faculty members from JMI stand out and are highly competent, which is why I rate the faculty 4 stars, thanks to them.

Faculty: Yes, teachers are helpful, knowledgeable, qualified and really good at teaching. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant but to be industry-ready, there should be more practical knowledge and teaching. Semester exams are quite handy, exam pattern is really good and the passing percentage is 40% or above.

Faculty: The faculty of this particular course at the college has a mixture of good and bad teachers. Many professors are great, but some are not. Some professors, despite having much experience, are less effective in teaching and sharing their knowledge.

Faculty: It's average; they are not providing that many good facilities during exams. I think they are taking more examination fees than exams because we bring our own material; they are not providing us anything after taking the practical fee. If you study the main topics so you can easily pass your exam, it's an easy and difficult mixture of subjects.