MES College of Engineering & Technology, Ernakulam Faculty Details & Reviews ,Ernakulum

Faculty: The teachers are really encouraging and helpful. Students with backpapers are also trained for the arrear exams and make sure they pass in the next exams. The teachers encourage extracurricular activities and motivate us for the programs.

Faculty: Our college follows the syllabus of KTU. It is very difficult to pass exams. All teachers are qualified. They do not complete the syllabus. The curriculum makes students industry-ready.

Faculty: The teachers are very helpful and well qualified. Most of the faculty members are M.Tech graduates and Ph.D. holders. They are very knowledgeable in their fields. The teaching quality is good and simple to understand. Basically, the course is so updated for better industrial knowledge that students have to do internships, so it doesn't give students that much knowledge about the trends of the industry.

Faculty: A few teachers are experienced. Many teachers are freshers. They are well-qualified. The teaching quality is up to the mark. The course curriculum doesn't make students industry-ready. Exams are difficult. The pass percentage is below average.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful. They are really good people. Curriculum is relevant and makes students industry ready. Pass percentage is unknown. Teachers are qualified. Our teachers are nice and awesome and they are helpful. Last exam we all had good results. Exams in college is nice and we have nice exam halls.

Faculty: All the teachers are very friendly and easy to communicate with. They are well-experienced professionals. There are 2 internal exams, and semester exams occur every 4-5 months. These exams are not easy; success depends on our study approach and hard work.

Faculty: The lab assistants and lecturers treated us well. Our college followed University guidelines and the same pattern for every exam. They were not strict on examinations and internal marks. Some relaxation was provided. They taught us well. The overall percentage of results in our batch was 50% which was higher than the nominal range. The first and second years were very difficult to pass. Compared to others, 4th year was very simple.