Legal Aptitude & Reasoning: Overview, Questions, Preparation

Q 1. Who is the only Judge of the Supreme Court of India to also have been the Vice-President of India?

(a) Justice A. N. Ray

(b) Justice Mohammad Hidayatullah

(c) Justice Patanjali Sastri

d) Justice P. N. Bhagwati

Q 2. Who replaced Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States?

(a) Neil Gorsuch

(b) Brett Kavanaugh

(c) Amy Coney Barrett

(d) Sonia Sotomayor

Q 3. Who among the following was not a judge of the Supreme Court of India?

(a) Justice R. Banumathi

(b) Justice Gyan Sudha Mishra

(c) Justice Manjula Chellur

(d) Justice Ranjana Prakash Desa

Q 4. In Kulbhushan Jadhav’s case between India and Pakistan before the International Court of Justice, the 15-1 majority found Pakistan to be in violation of obligations under which international law instrument?

(a) Vienna Convention on Consular Relations

(b) International Convention on Civil and Political Rights

(c) United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners

(d) United Nations Convention Against Torture

Correct Options: Q 1: (b), Q 2: (c), Q 3: (c), Q 4: (a)

Also Read:

• CLAT previous year question papers
• AILET previous year question papers
• LSAT India previous year question papers
• SLAT previous year question papers
• MH CET Law previous year question papers

Q 1.
Principle: No confession made to a Police Officer, shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence.

Facts: Ritu was accused of having murdered Akash over a property dispute. After arrest, Ritu made a confession to the Inspector that she had in fact murdered Akash. The confessional statement of Ritu was written on a paper and Ritu signed the same. The police carried on further investigation but were not able to find any other evidence to produce before the court. Can the confessional statement signed by Ritu be proved in court?

(a) No, such a confessional statement cannot be proved since the confession was made to a Police Officer.

(b) Yes, such a confessional statement can be proved since it is not an oral confession. It has been duly signed by Ritu and hence there is no doubt that she made the confession herself.

(c) Yes, since there is no other evidence, it is necessary to rely on this statement or else a serious offender will escape the clutches of criminal law.

(d) Both (b) and (c)

Q 2.
Principle: No tenant of immovable property shall, during the continuance of the tenancy, be permitted to deny that the landlord of such tenant had, at the beginning of the tenancy, a title to such immovable property.

Facts: Aishwarya rented a flat from Nidhi for 2 years. She signed a rent agreement and regularly paid the monthly rent to Nidhi for 6 months. In the seventh month, Ashish approached Aishwarya and told her that he is the real owner of the property and that Nidhi is defrauding Aishwarya as well as Ashish. Ashish showed Aishwarya the original property papers which showed him to be the real owner. Satisfied that the papers were genuine and that Ashish is the actual owner, Aishwarya stopped paying the rent to Nidhi and started paying the same to Ashish. Nidhi filed a suit against Aishwarya for the recovery of rent arrears. Aishwarya took the defence that Nidhi was never the real owner of the flat and that she will pay the rent to the real owner i.e. Ashish. Decide.

(a) Aishwarya should pay the rent to Nidhi since she took the property on rent from Nidhi and now she cannot deny Nidhi’s title over the property

(b) Aishwarya has checked the property papers herself and it is clear to her that Ashish is the actual owner. Thus, she can deny Nidhi’s title and should pay the rent to Ashish

(c) Aishwarya should deposit the money in court and let the court decide who to give the money to

(d) A disputed property should never be given on rent until the dispute is resolved

Q 3.

Principle: A person who suffers an injury caused as a result of a risk to which they consented, cannot complain of the consequent damage. The defendant must have the capacity to give consent to risks involved, have complete knowledge of the extent as well as nature of risks and agree to the risk voluntarily.

Facts: Q urged his older brother Z to allow him to ride Z’s motorbike. Q had recently obtained a motorbike driving license and was eager to ride Z’s motorbike. The motorbike had a complex operation mechanism, which Q did not understand. Z did not bother to explain this to Q and let him ride the bike. Q met with an accident and is suing Z for the injuries caused. Z contends that Q consented to the risk. Decide.

(a) Q did not consent to the risk because he did not have capacity to consent to the risk

(b) Q did not consent to the risk because his consent was not voluntary

(c) Q consented to the risk because he urged Z to let him ride the motorbike

(d) Q did not consent to the risk because he did not have knowledge of the extent and nature of risk

Correct Options: Q 1: (a), Q 2: (a), Q 3: (d)

Read the below passage:

Answer the five subsequent questions:

Q 1. Which of the following statements correctly depicts the essentials of misrepresentation?

(A) A misrepresentation is a positive statement of fact, which is made or adopted by a party to a contract and is untrue.

(B) Misrepresentation and false representation do not mean the same.

(C) If one party has induced the other to enter into a contract by misrepresenting, though innocently, any material fact especially within his own knowledge, the party misled cannot avoid the contract.

(D) A misrepresentation is a negative statement of fact, which is made or adopted by a party to a contract and is true.

Q 2. Consider the statements given below and answer which one correctly describes a fraudulent act.

(I) The expression fraud means an intention to deceive, whether it is from any expectation of advantage to the party himself or from ill will towards the other is immaterial.

(II) A fraud is an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing something by taking an unfair advantage of another. It is a deception to gain from another’s loss.

(III) Fraud arises out of deliberate active role of representator about a fact.

(A) (I), (II) are correct.

(B) (I) correct.

(C) (I), (II), (III) are correct.

(D) (I) and (II) are correct but (III) is incorrect.

Q 3. Which of the following statements is correct?

(A) Fraud is an innocent wrong whereas misrepresentation is an intentional wrong.

(B) The principal difference between fraud and misrepresentation is that in the former, the person making the suggestion does not believe it to be true and, in the latter, he believes it to be true.

(C) In fraud and misrepresentation both, it is not a misstatement of fact, which misleads the promise.

(D) Fraud and misrepresentation both are innocent wrongs

Q 4. Mr. A sells a car to Mr. Y, his childhood friend with a knowledge that the car is defective. Before buying the car, Mr. Y says to Mr. A, “If you do not deny it, I shall assume that the car is perfect”. Mr. A says nothing. In light of the statement, decide the liability of Mr. A.

(A) A’s silence is equivalent to speech and hence a misrepresentation.

(B) A is not liable for fraud, but liable for misrepresentation.

(C) A is liable for fraud and misrepresentation both.

(D) A’s silence is equivalent to speech and hence a fraud

Q 5. In which of the following statements will a contract not be voidable at the option of a party?

(A) When a party takes consent by fraud.

(B) When a party takes consent by misrepresentation.

(C) A contract entered by fraud and misrepresentation is neither void nor voidable.

(D) When silence amounts to fraud, but the other party whose consent was taken had discovered the truth or had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence.

Correct Options: Q 1: (A), Q 2: (C), Q 3: (B), Q 4: (D), Q 5: (D)

Q.1) Dealing with the chapter of citizenship under the constitution, the Supreme Court has held that Sonia Gandhi, the president of Congress, is not an Italian citizen but is an Indian citizen because she is governed by:

a) Article 10, Constitution of India

b) Article 11, Constitution of India

c) The Citizenship Act of 1955

d) Article 5, Constitution of India

Ans: c

Q.2) In March 2018, the Supreme Court of India held that there could not be a stay of more than ------on trial of----

a) 6 months of civil and criminal cases

b) 6 months, criminal cases

c) 3 months, rape cases

d) 3 months, civil and criminal cases

Ans: a

Q.3) Which of the following committee has recommended measures for banning and controlling ragging in educational establishments in India?

a) The Raghavan Committee

b) Jasraj Committee

c) Narsimhan Committee

d) Soli Sorabjee Committee

Ans: a

Q.4) The Janata Party Government of Morarjee Desai Constituted _______ to find out the truth about the excesses committed by the Indira Gandhi Government during an emergency (1975-77).

a) Shahbano Commission

b) Jagmohan Commission

c) Shah Commission

d) Nayyar Commission

Ans: c

Read more: Download important legal knowledge questions PDF for AILET 2024

Q.5) ______ of the Constitution of India lays down that the Union of India and the States are a juristic person and can sue and be sued

a) Article 225

b) Article 268

c) Article 300

d) Article 348

Ans: c