Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: The faculty-to-student ratio is pretty good. Faculty members are well-trained and educated. The teachers here come well-prepared for each lecture and interact with students often to provide them with valuable information. I've chosen this course because it offers a great outcome in the end, providing a life-setting experience. University offers students great internship opportunities in their second year. The experience here is pretty good, considering the competition. Exams are quite challengin...

Faculty: Faculty of this college was helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They were offering good quality teaching to their students. Course curriculum followed at our college was relevant. It makes the students industry-ready. Semester exams were of medium difficulty at the college.

Faculty: Faculty is good as they are supportive and helpful. They don't force students to do anything. Course curriculum includes foundation courses, basic medical subjects, and electives. Foundation courses: human anatomy, human physiology exercise therapy, electrotherapy, and many more. Basic medical subjects: Provide a strong foundation for physiotherapy practice.

Faculty: The faculty is geniune and subject centric. They provide all the relevant information which is enough to get good marks in the exams. Some of them are qualified from the IITs and Iims and other private universities. Their Course curriculum is as per the guidelines of the UGC. This University definitely makes students industry ready. The exams are easy if you study with focus. The pass percentage of this University is 80-90 percent.

Faculty: Teachers were helpful and qualified till 2020. After that, most of them switched to other universities, and new professionals were hired. They were good but lack in knowledge. They did not know how to cover the syllabus. They had not made us practice coding. The theoretical part was mostly covered in class.

Faculty: The teachers at our college were really helpful and qualified. Teachers were qualified in their respective subjects. The course curriculum was relevant to the present time. Semester exams can be easily passed by studying before the examinations. Teachers were supportive of the students at the college.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college were not good. They didn't have syllabus knowledge and were unable to teach properly. They left everything to students. DSA teachers could not code simple programs. Their teaching quality was not good. The course curriculum was irrelevant to the industry. It included subjects like commerce management, natural disaster financial management, and many more for computer science students. It didn't teach good skills to students. Semester exams were easy. Teachers taught...

Faculty: Faculty is under-qualified for teaching even the basic subjects of the syllabus. HODs of every department are using their designations as a formality to get paid. Every member of the staff is working for the sake of money.

Faculty: Teachers were excellent in their field, and the curriculum was updated. Students and teachers had good bonding with each other. The pass percentage was 40%, which was easy for students who study regularly. Everyone easily passed the exams. Staff and teachers were very cooperative and knowledgeable. All teachers were qualified in their streams.

Faculty: Faculty members of our college are highly qualified. The course curriculum is highly relevant as it made us industry-ready. Exams totally depends upon preparation. The average pass percentage is 7 CGPA. Exams are neither so difficult nor so easy. It totally depends on us.

Faculty: The teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. This course helps the students get industry-ready by providing industry exposure through guest lectures and training. The pass percentage is 33%. Semester exams are not so difficult because exams are conducted according to the syllabus covered in the semester.

Faculty: There are very good faculty members here. They are helpful, well qualified and knowledgeable. Most of the staff members in pharma are PhD holders and studied M.Pharma. Some teachers have a bachelor's degree. Teachers also have a hostel facility to stay, and there is a good environment. The campus is good.

Faculty: Teachers here are helpful and provide guidance for the studies. They provide each possible help for solving queries of students. They also provide a special focus on academically week students for their knowledge and in projects help them by providing full guidance and support regarding the topic.

Faculty: Teacher staff is very cooperative. But the higher authorities is not take that actions which is useful for students. The university can try to make student's industrial ready but the resources is not sufficient the labs conditions is okay. According to me the university can only focus on their result but not give sufficient knowledge.

Faculty: Teachers here were enough qualified. They gave us insight about practical life and also they gave us information about the various tournaments which helped us to gain practical knowledge. They were not helpful in final projects. The course curriculum is not satisfactory as it is old and does not help in gaining an advantage.