CUK Faculty Details & Reviews ,Karnataka - Other

Faculty: Most of the faculty members at Central University of Karnataka are good. They are supportive. If students have any doubts regarding anything, they can ask faculty members and they will try to help us. Especially, my department, public administration, and faculty members are great. They teach us well. They will become a mentor for our lifetime if we listen to them.

Faculty: The quality of teachers is better in my opinion. They have good qualifications in their subjects. The subjects they planned or arranged for my course are in a better manner in which they have researched and taken a good decision. Before the semester exams, they conduct two internal exams. Exams are standard in which our minimum mark for passing shows we attain a minimum quality in that particular subject.

Faculty: I have studied a triple main course. Therefore teachers of these three subjects have to come to our department for teaching us. Physics department have really good teacher who knows the subject very well. Maths department also have good teachers . But the chemistry department is really kind of disappointment. We have got all the facilities are contractual. And some of them don't know anything about the subject. The syllabus is not that hard. And the exam question papers are prepared by our teach...

Faculty: Teachers in this course are so helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. All teachers have greater teaching quality. This course is curriculum-relevant, and students are industry-ready. Semester exams in this course are so easy; therefore, the pass percentage is 80% in this course.

Faculty: Some of the teachers are very helpful, but some do not care at all. They just want to complete the syllabus but are not cooperative. Teaching quality, except for one or two teachers, is very poor. The course curriculum is relevant to the industry if the department focuses on students' lab experiments and not just theory. The semester exam difficulty level is average, and the passing percentage is more than 95%.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified and helpful, with 3 professors, 3 assistant professors, and 2 contractual faculty members. Their teaching qualities are good. The course curriculum is partially relevant, as fieldwork experiences are lacking. The course should prioritize weekly fieldwork, but there is no such practice on campus. The semester exams are easy, with an average pass mark around 25%, though I am not sure.

Faculty: One of the only good things in the university are faculty members. They are very helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable. They are required to have a Ph.D. in any aspect of chemistry compulsory. Course curriculum is changed and the change seems to be good.

Faculty: The curriculum is extensive, and additional facts and information are being provided along with the syllabus. The faculty members are well-experienced and friendly. The university itself prepares the question papers for semester exams. The level of questions ranges from moderate to hard. The pass percentage varies from subject to subject. For B.Ed, the pass percentage was 100.

Faculty: Most professors in my department are graduated from top central universities and NIT. Their teaching techniques are good and easy to understand. They provide their notes which are of the best quality.

Faculty: The faculty of Chemistry at CUK are well-educated, experienced, and approachable. They are supportive and guide students effectively in academics and research. Like anywhere, teaching styles vary, and each faculty member has their strengths and areas for improvement.

Faculty: Exams are conducted semester-wise, which range from easy to moderate in difficulty. Students can easily study and crack the exams. Surprise tests and internal tests are conducted to check our knowledge and how much we have studied, so we can stay in regular touch with our books as well.

Faculty: The curriculum and faculty are just okay, or average. Exams are too easy, and more students can easily qualify for their pass percentage. But the exam fee/semester fee is too high. There's no fee relation for other backward people or merit students. They're not providing any material.

Faculty: The faculty in my department are the worst; they come and open their systems and read slides only. They are not updated. The syllabus is also old in my department. But they conduct examinations on time, and they publish results on time. It is not that difficult to score good marks.

Faculty: Curriculum of the mentioned degree is well designed and taught. The teachers are very supportive and help in academics. The curriculum and computer-based education make students industry-ready. The exams are of all kinds, easy to medium to analysis-based.

Faculty: The teaching quality is too good, and every professor is well qualified in their field and supportive too, always available for students' welfare. Yes, it makes students industry-ready and corporate-ready too. The semester exams are tough, and you have to put in effort, and the pass percentage is 40%.