CUK Faculty Details & Reviews ,Karnataka - Other

Faculty: The faculty of Chemistry at CUK are well-educated, experienced, and approachable. They are supportive and guide students effectively in academics and research. Like anywhere, teaching styles vary, and each faculty member has their strengths and areas for improvement.

Faculty: Exams are conducted semester-wise, which range from easy to moderate in difficulty. Students can easily study and crack the exams. Surprise tests and internal tests are conducted to check our knowledge and how much we have studied, so we can stay in regular touch with our books as well.

Faculty: I have studied a triple main course. Therefore teachers of these three subjects have to come to our department for teaching us. Physics department have really good teacher who knows the subject very well. Maths department also have good teachers . But the chemistry department is really kind of disappointment. We have got all the facilities are contractual. And some of them don't know anything about the subject. The syllabus is not that hard. And the exam question papers are prepared by our teach...

Faculty: The curriculum and faculty are just okay, or average. Exams are too easy, and more students can easily qualify for their pass percentage. But the exam fee/semester fee is too high. There's no fee relation for other backward people or merit students. They're not providing any material.

Faculty: The faculty in my department are the worst; they come and open their systems and read slides only. They are not updated. The syllabus is also old in my department. But they conduct examinations on time, and they publish results on time. It is not that difficult to score good marks.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified and helpful, with 3 professors, 3 assistant professors, and 2 contractual faculty members. Their teaching qualities are good. The course curriculum is partially relevant, as fieldwork experiences are lacking. The course should prioritize weekly fieldwork, but there is no such practice on campus. The semester exams are easy, with an average pass mark around 25%, though I am not sure.

Faculty: Curriculum of the mentioned degree is well designed and taught. The teachers are very supportive and help in academics. The curriculum and computer-based education make students industry-ready. The exams are of all kinds, easy to medium to analysis-based.

Faculty: The teaching quality is too good, and every professor is well qualified in their field and supportive too, always available for students' welfare. Yes, it makes students industry-ready and corporate-ready too. The semester exams are tough, and you have to put in effort, and the pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Good faculty. They teach valuable things. Yes, teachers are helpful, and they always teach for a bright future. The teaching quality is good. This course curriculum is relevant, but it doesn't make the students industry-ready. The semester is not a big thing for me.

Faculty: Faculty members are having good qualifications and done with the higher degree. The teaching quality is good, with a very perfect explanation. Our course is not curriculum-relevant. Exams are easy if we read and practice daily.50 percent of marks required to pass the semester exams.

Faculty: Faculty members are qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. The teaching methods are effective, and the course curriculum is relevant. Assignments are designed to provide knowledge pertinent to the industry. Semester examinations are somewhat challenging, but most students pass, with top scores reaching around 80%.

Faculty: There are professors and assistant professors with high qualifications who are good at mentoring when needed. They conduct classes with presentations, group discussions, and other interactive methods. However, some are not very good with certain students, and some are more professional.

Faculty: The teachers are knowledgeable, qualified, and helpful. Their teaching style and methods are very effective for studying. The course syllabus is good, and the department follows the academic calendar correctly. The semester exams are conducted smoothly, and students do not face much difficulty. A score above 40 marks is required to pass.

Faculty: The teachers are well qualified and knowledgeable but the problem is they are not teaching in a proper way. That is there teaching quality is very bad. The teachers are not at all students friendly and some teachers are very professional and some are not at all professional. Some teachers will keep personal grudge. The course curriculum is outdated. The exams are not that much difficult and the pass percentage is almost 100. But the marks will be less for students.

Faculty: The teaching quality that you can expect is high because all the teachers are doctorate holders in their specific subject and all of them will show quality in teaching and explaining the things, and the curriculum is better to gain knowledge. Only some of the current technologies are lacking in the syllabus, such as artificial intelligence tools and things. Semester exams are comparatively good and the toughness will be measured by our preparation and knowledge and the pass percentage is 40 perc...