Kerala University Faculty Details & Reviews ,Thiruvananthapuram

Faculty: The teachers in our college are really good. They are very well qualified and are also very knowledgeable in terms of the course content that they offer. The interaction section in the classes keeps the class fun and we have a 100% pass percentage each year.

Faculty: Faculty members of my college are qualified. Their teaching methods are really nice. They are very supportive and helpful. The course curriculum is relevant. Students are highly trained to become future lawyers. Many academic activities like moot court competitions, national seminars, MUN etc., are conducted for students' benefit.

Faculty: The curriculum should also be open to evaluation and change, as needed. Flexibility is the key. The school curriculum may sometimes have to respond to include new and important subjects, e. g. information about the pandemic, the need for individual action for tackling climate change etc.

Faculty: The teachers are very helpful and knowledgeable. The quality of teaching depends on the teachers. Some of the teachers lack good teaching skills, but others teach very well. The semester exams are quite manageable; the only thing is that there is not enough time to cover the vast syllabus.

Faculty: In college, 50-65% of students get placements in our course. Students in our study were getting decent placements. Average offered in LPA is 13 to 25. Top recruiting companies are Cermaq, Skretting, Aller Aqua, etc. Top roles are Aquatic Biologist, Fisheries Manager, etc. 55% of students get internship opportunities in various types.

Faculty: All the teachers here are highly qualified and well-educated individuals. But most of them are very egoistic and tend to take revenge on students by reducing their internal marks. Still, there are some teachers who are very helpful, motivating, and encouraging. The curriculum was a bit outdated, but it was recently revised, including the new BNSS, BNS, etc., instead of the old IPC, CRPC, etc. The university lags behind in conducting semester exams on time and puts a burden on the students. The p...

Faculty: The faculty in this course are moderately helpful and qualified, but the teaching quality could be more engaging and practical. The curriculum, while partially relevant, lacks certain industry-specific skills to make students fully job-ready. Semester exams are moderately challenging, focusing more on theoretical aspects rather than practical applications. The pass percentage is reasonable, but better guidance and practical exposure would improve student outcomes.

Faculty: The college teachers are very good and provide the best knowledge regarding the subjects. The teaching quality of these teachers is very high with very good explanations. These teachers are master's degree courses qualified. This course has a total duration of 2 years, with 2 semester exams for this course.

Faculty: Teachers are not hardworking even though they are well paid. Teachers are highly qualified. They have a lot of knowledge but they don't put effort into us. Semester wise exams are very lag that it will be difficult for us to cover portions and remember them.

Faculty: Faculty members are mostly highly qualified. Most of them hold PhDs and are very experienced. Also, most of their teaching ability is quite good. The behavior of some of the faculty members has felt bad and overly strict, but overall I'm quite satisfied with their teaching skills.

Faculty: The teaching quality is average. Some teachers are enthusiastic and help us in understanding the concepts. Most teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. The semester exams are of medium level and the pass percentage is 40. Students need to go beyond the curriculum to be fully ready for industry life and jobs. The curriculum is a bit outdated.

Faculty: Our department faculty is helpful and qualified, with most of the faculty awarded doctorates. Our university (APJ Abdul Kalam University) is outdated and needs to be improved as it doesn't make a student industry-ready. We have to train ourselves in order to get better jobs and placements. The semester exam difficulty is medium and the pass percentage is 40 percent.

Faculty: The teachers are supportive, and their notes are sufficient for passing the KTU examinations. There are two series examinations in each semester, and they decide our internal marks. The whole syllabus is strictly followed based on course outcomes, which helps us to be more practical.

Faculty: The faculty members of the college are well-experienced and easily approachable. The curriculum is relevant and well-structured, preparing students to step into the technological world. Students can score good marks if they prepare well for the semester exams.

Faculty: My class tutor is better at teaching but not friendly with us. The semester exams are difficult to attend. The course is not curriculum-relevant. It does not make the students industry-ready. There is only a low pass percentage. They don’t know how to manage a college.