KUK Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: The teachers were helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is above average. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant and it makes the student industry ready. The semester exams are not so difficult.

Faculty: Yes, the teachers are very helpful. They always try to explain things more easily. They tell us what to do and how to do it. They are very good, they make complex concepts very easy. Also, they help us with everything. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant, Industrial visits occur. The course makes us industry ready.

Faculty: The faculty is good. Teachers are skilled, knowledgeable and qualified. The course curriculum of my course is about 5 years for BDS and 3 years for MS. Patient flow is not so good. The exam pattern for BDS and MS is yearly. Smart classes and different models are available.

Faculty: Not all faculty members, but a few of them are good in nature. Professors in the CSE department are very helpful. Exams are divided into two sets, mid-sem and end-sem, with a level that is neither too easy nor too difficult. We also have a relative grading system. Thus, even average students who are not too strong in studies have a good chance of scoring well.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful in any way they can and are frank. Teaching methods of some are unique so that students can study with interest. Qualifications of teachers are professors, assistant professors, associate professors. Teaching quality is good and knowledgeable. Yes, the course curriculum makes students industry-relevant. Semester exams are not much difficult, but checking is not acceptable. Passing criteria is in the main exam: 30 out of 75 and in internal exams: 10 out of 25.

Faculty: Teachers are somewhat helpful but not highly qualified or knowledgeable. The quality of teaching is not good, and the course is not industry-relevant. Exams are not difficult, and students can easily pass them.

Faculty: Teachers here are very helpful and they support, mentor students. Teachers help students in academics as well as in their careers. They are very qualified and knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is the best, and they give their best for teaching the students.

Faculty: The faculty is quite good and supportive in terms of studies. The teachers are well qualified and experienced. The course curriculum is flexible, offering students to choose a foundation course like MDC on their own. The semester exams are not very difficult.

Faculty: The faculty of the college is very knowledgeable and experienced. The faculty of the college provides support to the students. They always help the students in any situation. The curriculum in the course is, I think, not relevant to the students. The difficulty of the semester exams in the college is very high, and various students get supplementary in the exams.

Faculty: The teachers are qualified, but very few are keen to take lectures seriously. The course curriculum only teaches programming but does not make students industry-ready. If you start studying one month before the exam, you can crack the semester exam. Exam questions are predictable.

Faculty: Teachers are good, helpful, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is good. The student-teacher ratio is 1:65. It is high. The course curriculum is not relevant. It keeps on changing the syllabus pattern and cannot decide the syllabus in one go. It makes students industry-ready. Exams are difficult. The pass percentage is less than 25%.

Faculty: Complete a bachelor’s degree, either B.A. or B.Sc. in geography. Achieve a minimum score of 50% in your Bachelor's degree. Semester examinations are hard. Each semester read different types of books. The university's marking system is very strong. This university is very good. There are knowledgeable teachers. Their teaching methods are very excellent.

Faculty: The teachers at this college are not helpful. Many teachers are very rude. Some don't even know how to talk to students. They don't make students industry-ready. Most teachers lack technical knowledge and focus more on theoretical concepts. The university is not student-friendly at all. It is only good at making students stuck in a never-ending loop of backlogs. The syllabus is outdated and has not been revised.

Faculty: Faculty is good in the college, but the management of the college is very rude; they didn't help you in any way; if you were right or wrong, they didn't help you. If you did any right thing but unfortunately it became wrong, then they didn't listen to you. They only fined you, and if you don't fill out the form, then they don't allow you to give the examination.

Faculty: The teachers in this college are very helpful, respectful, and knowledgeable. The quality of teaching is very good; they clear the smallest of doubts and explain all the topics. The college provides many other courses like B.Com, B.Sc., M.Com, etc. Students are ready to take admission in the courses.