Faculty of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Faridabad

Faculty: All teachers are Ph.D. graduates, and they are highly knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is very good. The course curriculum is very relevant; it makes us face the daily problems we encounter in life. We have very intellectual classes, and they have a very strict syllabus for every semester exam. The percentage of passed students is very high; almost 90% of students pass.

Faculty: Faculty members are worst. They are not helpful, but rude, and arrogant. They deliberately try to detain and fail students, so that they can earn money from PSC and reappear exam fees. PSC fees are very high i.e., Rs. 5,000 per subject, and reappear fee which is Rs. 2,000 per subject, which is not at all affordable.

Faculty: Maximum faculty are well qualified and knowledgeable. They are also helpful if you have some genuine reason to not attend college, they even re-explain the topic sometimes if you genuinely want to study. There are 3 exams in one semester (2 midsems and one endsem). Midsems of 30 marks are extremely easy as maximum questions are from pre-given assignments, the endsem might be comparatively harder, but studying can fetch good marks.

Faculty: Faculty are very well-qualified. The teaching quality is average but not for all faculty. Some faculty teach very practically. The semester exam is very easy. There are two sessional exams and one end-semester exam. Just revise the assignment questions and previous year papers, and you can score better marks.

Faculty: Teachers were qualified with Ph.D. The course curriculum was designed specifically for the lower and average students. It's not difficult to pass the exams. Sometimes teachers did favors to pass the students with no backlogs. Attendance was 75% mandatory for everyone, but you can get grace with 65% of attendance.

Faculty: The teachers were helpful and knowledgeable about the subject they were teaching but the course curriculum was completely outdated. For engineering students, they taught C and C+ for 3 semesters straight and gave very little importance to javascript and python in the course. Whereas both javascript and python are the programming languages used in most IT/teach companies. So the course had very little relevance to the market demands. Passing percentage was 40 and we used to have exams at the end ...

Faculty: The faculty in my college are qualified and knowledgeable, and the teaching quality is good. We had no problems with the teaching quality. The exams are not too hard or too easy. My previous semester percentage was 80 marks out of 200.

Faculty: There is not a proper structure for the reappear and the detained exams which are very poor, and also the fees for the reappear are raised by four times the original price, which is very difficult for the students to pay. This is very unfair because they are essentially earning money by these practices. This is not acceptable; someone has to take part in this because they are taking ₹4000 per credit as a subject.

Faculty: Faculty here are good. They explain all concepts very clearly and regularly take smart classes. They know how to explain all concepts. Curriculum is also good. Exams are taken regularly like sessional 1, sessional 2 and end semester. Faculty takes care of all students so that concept get clear.

Faculty: The teachers are well qualified and experienced too; their behavior reflects their personalities, except a few teachers are a bit strict, but if you will listen to them, they are not going to charm you in any aspects. When it comes to the course, the real first reason to say this is that they do provide coding and language classes like C+ from the very first year and first semester itself, although there are no written exams for these, which are very useful. They start it with very real-life exa...

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified and knowledgeable and also helpful in almost every aspect from 2nd year. The first year may be a bit problematic to adjust, but then teachers are helpful from the 2nd year. They also repeat required topics and give required material for exams.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful; most have completed their Ph.D. and provide good teaching quality. The course curriculum is relevant, and the institute provides hands-on experience in labs, workshops, and real-life projects to ensure students are well-prepared. Exams are of medium difficulty, and basic knowledge helps students pass. The pass percentage is 25% in internal and 25% in external exams, with a total requirement of 80 marks in both internal and external assessments.

Faculty: The curriculum of the course is very good in the initial period; all the students have same syllabus, which consists of basic engineering in all field like Biology electrical engineering, AI mechanical engineering, etc. It is because if you want to pursue your Masters abroad, this basic knowledge will help you get admission to a university abroad.

Faculty: The faculty and curriculum are excellent. Subject faculty are more than sufficient and always ready to help the students. Every mentor is the best and helps with all the daily tasks assigned to students. I love the college teachers, as I haven’t seen this type of dedication anywhere else.

Faculty: There are many great teachers who are highly qualified and have 20+ years of teaching experience. A few teachers are also very helpful when it comes to academics. The course curriculum is kind of relevant from the second year for the engineering students. The semester exam is tough but it doesn't seem tough when you actually study what was taught in the class and on the on the assignment. The pass percentage is 80 out of 200 marks.