PET Engineering College Faculty Details & Reviews ,Tirunelveli

Faculty: The teachers are well trained and qualified. They taught us, having 6 to 8 years of experience. They were very knowledgeable and the quality of their teaching was good. They are clarifying our doubts. The course curriculum is relevant to the subject. The semester exams are difficult. 65% is the pass percentage.

Faculty: Most of the college professors were who studied in this college. Our seniors will teach classes, and some will join as professors after they graduate. Teaching quality was like just training to pass an exam. The course curriculum had little to do with actual fieldwork. Exams were difficult to pass because of Anna University. If you write well, passing an exam is dependent upon the mood of the evaluator. The pass percentage of the exam was 45%.

Faculty: The course curriculum appeared promising initially, but it turned out to be quite basic. I anticipated gaining substantial knowledge, but it resembled what I studied in the 12th grade. There was a lack of practical-based learning; it was predominantly theory-based. The faculty members are helpful, and exams are conducted punctually. The class size is 56, and the course fee is INR 35,000 per year.

Faculty: Daily class tests and 5 internal exams and so many hand written notes for students. Friendly faculty members. The staffs in our college were highly educated and very helpful to us. The semester exam was little bit tough based on the last regulation, but our college almost passed all the exams.

Faculty: Teachers in this college are great. College have name because of teaching. Ratio: 120:10 (per department). No industry Exposure. Course curriculum is not useful. Even I got All Cleared and I didn't get a job. Only 2 or 4 experienced faculty members are in each department. College Management don't provide any increments or other facilities to them.

Faculty: In our college the faculty are very favourable with students and the way of teaching is good. All the faculty are well in teaching experience. The civil and mechanical engineering department have a very good faculty. Because they are good in teaching and the way they are communicating with students.

Faculty: All the faculty members are very good in teaching. There are many staffs with Ph.D. and some of them are still pursuing it. Nearly all dept HOD's are Doctorates. They provide us with good teaching and also support us in our curricular activities too. In short Faculty and course curriculum are well.

Faculty: The teachers are very helpful. Most of the staff are very talented and knowledgeable. We have gone to an industrial visit. Teaching methods are blackboard most probably used, and sometimes projectors are also used. Student to faculty ratio is about 40:1. Most of the teachers will be helpful to students.

Faculty: Out of 10 staffs, 7 of them are helpful and knowledgeable. The teaching method like blackboard is used. Their teaching quality is better. The student to faculty ratio is 50:1. Our college has arranged an industrial visit for the students. The projectors were used only by a few staffs.

Faculty: Teaching quality not expected because most of the professors using teaching Tamil its the problem. Otherwise staffs are do coaching classes, daily examinations etc. The educational qualification of all staffs are high so they are well knowledge in engineering.

Faculty: Some of the teachers in our college are well qualified and some teachers have average skills. All teachers help students to get good score in exams. Traditional method of teaching was conducted in our college. In our college 60 students were handled by single staff.

Faculty: Most of the teachers are highly talented, but some staffs don't have any knowledge to handle their lesson. Board, books, sometimes projectors are used. We don't receive any industry exposure. Totally, the course curriculum is somewhat useful. The student to teacher ratio is 35:1.