Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Rohini, Delhi

Faculty: The teachers are qualified, but they lack proper teaching sense. I know every student learns differently, but according to me, the faculty is decent only. The curriculum was changed when I joined the college in 2021, and it is now being changed again to meet modern standards. During my time at college, I was learning Full Stack Development in my 6th semester. The subjects were pretty outdated, e.g., PHP was taught at this time when much better languages are now used. Talking about exams, the int...

Faculty: Most of the professors in the college are good and understanding, with well-educated staff. Exams are leniently checked. The course curriculum is outdated, but you get extra time to develop your skills, and there are many societies related to teaching. Semester exams are easy and easy to pass.

Faculty: We have well-qualified professors, mostly with doctorate degrees, but I would not say they are knowledgeable. The course is designed in such a way that you will be industry-ready. We have two exams in each semester; one is the midterm college-level exam. And the second is the end-term examination, which is the university-level exam. Both are easy to pass because of lenient checking.

Faculty: Faculty members are very helpful with academics and often assist students outside the classroom as well. Most teachers have a strong grasp of their subjects and are available for doubt-clearing beyond college hours. The curriculum of IP is moderate, not very hard, not very easy. If you study one week before the exam, you can score well. The course is not enough for the industry, but it covers all the basic languages. The passing mark is 40 out of 100, including internal marks.

Faculty: Faculty members are very helpful and highly educated. They also give extra time to students to clear their doubts. The college also has very good management in taking mid-semester exams and also viva which is really very helpful for students in their end-semester exams.

Faculty: Mostly teachers or professors here don't wish to teach and come only because of their jobs. They don't have that charisma or great teaching skills. Students also lack the winner motivation to study. Our department is the worst at giving internal marks. They give good marks to the management students or teachers pet.

Faculty: Teachers try to rush the syllabus as a lot of classes get canceled because only few students attend the classes. Entire syllabus is not covered and teachers try to complete them with extra classes. The curriculum of 1st year was pretty useless but later on they taught relevant stuff. Semester exams are pretty easy with 2 mid-term exams and one internal practical.

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified and always helpful. You can ask fo their guidance at any point of time. We are also alloted with our group mentors who always guide us towards our performance in college. Semester exams are not very difficult if we remain consistent in our studies. The college though doesn't completely make the students industry ready. We have to upskill ourselves apart from college studies.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful; they do not miss classes, but many times I feel they only come to complete the syllabus. One more thing is there are no substitute teachers in our college, so if teachers are absent, our classes will go in vain. But teachers take fewer holidays.

Faculty: The teachers and professors are well-known in their respective subjects, with a strong grasp of the topics. They are mostly helpful and ready to assist when needed. The course is relevant, with new specialized branches such as Data Science and Machine Learning.

Faculty: The teachers at my college were really helpful and always tried to solve my doubts. However, the course curriculum was outdated, and we had to learn industrial study by ourselves. The semester exams were not that hard, in fact, they were quite easy. There were two midterms and one final exam, so it was quite hectic.

Faculty: The faculty at MAIT for IT is knowledgeable, approachable, and well qualified, with many holding advanced degrees and industry experience. The teaching quality is good, emphasizing hands-on learning through labs and projects. The curriculum is industry-relevant, covering subjects like AI, cybersecurity, and full-stack development, which prepare students for competitive roles. Semester exams are moderately difficult, but with consistent preparation, most students perform well. The pass percentage...

Faculty: The college has very nice teachers. There are two mid-semester exams and one end-semester exam conducted every semester. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant, and if the student is dedicated, then he or she is industry-ready too. Semester examinations are not so tough and not so easy.

Faculty: Some teachers are very good, helpful, and knowledgeable. The curriculum, according to me, is average, as I think it should include more advanced subjects and courses that are trending these days. Also, the curriculum should include exposure to industrial training rather than book studies.

Faculty: Faculty members were good enough, but a few faculty members were not well-trained and were unable to teach us properly or handle the class and students effectively. The exam pattern included two external exams every year for each semester, and in total, external exams were held six times in three years according to the semester schedule. Exam pattern was simple. The paper used to be 75 marks and 25 marks were internal marks that college used to give us by assessing our performance each semester....